Hate Crime

X. Conclusion

Hate crime is defined as an illegal act against a person, institution, or property that is motivated, in whole or in part, by the offender’s bias against the victim’s group membership. Although hate crime is a relatively new category of crime, the United States has a long history of biased actions against individuals because of their race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, and gender. Since the late 1980s and early 1990s, the federal government and states have collected data on hate crime occurrences as well as developed specific laws against such crimes. There are differences between the federal and state laws as well as differences among the states. Most differences include varied group coverage in the law. Because of these differences and the underreporting of incidents, the true rates remain unknown.

Research in the last few decades has indicated that African Americans are the most likely victims of hate crime in the United States, followed by people of the Jewish faith and individuals of differing sexual orientation or gender identity. Initial typology study has indicated the most common type of hate crime offender commits hate crime because of thrill/excitement, followed by defensive, retaliatory, and mission reasons. Research has also specified that the most common hate crime perpetrator is a young, white male, who is not associated with an organized hate group. Research also shows that brutality is more likely for this crime because of the group perpetration, victims are typically strangers, and the crime is expressive rather than instrumental in nature.

Law enforcement, the overall criminal justice system, and anti-hate organizations have developed programs and tools to help respond to and prevent hate crime. For example, several police agencies have developed hate crime teams, several jurisdictions require treatment for hate crime perpetrators, and both national and regional anti-hate organizations have developed Web sites to provide communities with information and aid in the prevention of these horrific crimes. It is encouraging to know that as hate organizations have developed over the United States’ history, so too have anti-hate groups that work just as hard in prevention.

Browse criminal justice research papers or view criminal justice research topics.


  1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  2. Anti-Defamation League: http://www.adl.org
  3. Brown, R. (1995). Prejudice: Its social psychology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  4. Craig-Henderson, K., & Sloan, L. R. (2003). After the hate: Helping psychologists help victims of racist hate crime. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(4), 481–490.
  5. Deane, C., & Fears, D. (2006, March 9). Negative perception of Islam increasing. Washington Post, 1.
  6. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Kawakami, K., & Hodson, G. (2002). Why can’t we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8(2), 88–102.
  7. Gaylin, W. (2003). Hatred: The psychological descent into violence. New York: Public Affairs.
  8. Gerstenfeld, P. B. (2004). Hate crimes: Causes, controls, and controversies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  9. Gerstenfeld, P. B., & Grant, D. R. (2004). Crimes of hate: Selected readings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  10. Grattet, R., & Jenness, V. (2001). Examining the boundaries of hate crime law: Disabilities and the “dilemma of difference.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 91, 653–697.
  11. Grieve, J. (2004). The investigation of hate crimes: Art, science or philosophy? In N. R. J. Hall, N. Abdullah-Kahn, D. Blackbourn, R. Fletcher, & J. Grieve (Eds.), Hate crime. Portsmouth, UK: Institute of Criminal Justice Studies.
  12. Hall, N. (2005). Hate crime. Devon, UK: Willan.
  13. Harlow, C. W. (2005, November). National Crime Victimization Survey and Uniform Crime Reporting: Hate crime reported by victims and police (NCJ 209911). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
  14. Herek, G. M., Gillis, J. R., Cogan, J. C., & Glunt, E. K. (1997). Hate crime victimization among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults: Prevalence, psychological correlates, and methodological issues. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(2), 195–215.
  15. Levin, J. (2007). The violence of hate: Confronting racism, anti- Semitism, and other forms of bigotry (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  16. McDevitt, J., Levin, J., & Bennett, S. (2002). Hate crime offenders: An expanded typology. Journal of Social Issues, 58(2), 303–317.
  17. National Gay and Lesbian Task Force: http://www.thetaskforce.org/
  18. Nolan, J. J., & Akiyama, Y. (1999). An analysis of factors that affect law enforcement participation in hate crime reporting. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 15, 111–127.
  19. Partners Against Hate: http://www.partnersagainsthate.org/
  20. Petrosino, C. (1999). Connecting the past to the future: Hate crime in America. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 15(1), 22–47.
  21. Shenk, A. H. (2001). Victim–offender mediation: The road to repairing hate crime injustice. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 17, 185–217.
  22. Simon Wiesenthal Center: http://www.wiesenthal.com/
  23. Southern Poverty Law Center: http://www.splcenter.org/
  24. Torres, S. (1999). Hate crimes against African Americans: The extent of the problem. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 15(1), 48–63.
  25. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2008, April). Crime and victims statistics. Retrieved August 21, 2013, from http://www.bjs.gov/
  26. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2008). Uniform Crime Reports: Hate crime statistics. Retrieved August 21, 2013, from http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2008
  27. Wang, L-W. (2002). Hate crime and everyday discrimination: Influences of and on the social context. Rutgers Race and Law Review, 4, 1–31.