VI. The Future of Criminology and Criminal Justice
During the past 40 years, criminology has emerged as one of the most dynamic social sciences and certainly the fastest growing. Today, it stands on clear foundations of commitment to scientific rigor, interdisciplinary theory of crime, and improving the operation and “justness” of the criminal justice system. It stands firmly on the shoulders of many individuals, most importantly Beccaria and Lombroso. Although federal funding for criminological research has diminished in recent years, there is every reason to believe that it will increase as the role of criminology in preventing and controlling crime through theory and evidence-based approaches becomes more widely known and appreciated.
Few major initiatives in criminal law and criminal justice during this period have been developed without significant criminological involvement. Hot-spots policing, problem-oriented policing, crime mapping and analysis, sentencing guidelines, specialized courts, sex offender programming, effective models of rehabilitation, reentry programs, problems of eyewitness identifications, procedures for police lineups and interrogations, the role of DNA in courts and policing—the list goes on and on. The point is that criminology is making a difference. As long as it continues to be rigorous in methods, interdisciplinary in approach, and guided by a commitment to justice, it will flourish and continue its emergence as a vital scientific enterprise.
Read more about Criminology.
- Beccaria, C. (1963). Essays on crime and punishment (H. Paolucci, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. (Original work published 1764)
- Bentham, J. (1789). Introduction to the principle of morals and legislation. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
- Brandstetter, A. (1989, October). Genesis and early history of criminal justice studies at Michigan State University. Paper presented at the Midwestern Criminal Justice Association meetings, Chicago. Retrieved from http://cj.msu.edu/assets/Brandstatter.pdf
- Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. London: JohnMurray.
- Dugdale, R. (1877). The jukes: A study in crime, pauperism and heredity. New York: Putnam.
- Garofalo, R. (1968). Criminology. Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith. (Original work published 1885)
- Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1968). Delinquents and nondelinquents in perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Goring, C. (1972). The English convict. Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith. (Original work published 1913)
- Lemert, E. (1972). Human deviance, social problems and social control (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Lombroso, C. (1876). Criminal man. Milan, Italy: Hoepli.
- McCullough, D. (2001). John Adams. NewYork: Simon & Schuster.
- Merton, R. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672–682.
- Moffitt, T. (2001). Adolescence-limited and life course persistent antisocial behavior. InA. Piquero & P.Mazerolle (Eds.), Lifecourse criminology (pp. 91–145). Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
- Morris, A. (1975). The American Society of Criminology: A history, 1941–1974. Criminology, 13, 123–167.
- Sampson, R. (2001). Foreword. In A. Piquero & P. Mazerolle (Eds.), Life-course criminology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Schur, E. (1971). Labelling deviant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Sellin, T. (1934). Foreword. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 74, ix.
- Sellin, T. (1938). Culture conflict and crime. New York: Social Science Research Council.
- Shaw, C., & McKay, H. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Spencer, H. (1874). Principles of sociology. London:Williams & Norgate.
- Sutherland, E. (1934). Principles of criminology. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
- Tappan, P. (1947). Who is criminal? American Sociological Review, 12, 96–102.
- Vold, G. (1979). Theoretical criminology (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Ward, L. (1883). Dynamic sociology. New York: Appleton.
- Wrong, D. (1961). The oversocialized conception of man. American Sociological Review, 26, 183–193.