Criminal Careers

VII. Conclusion

The notion that offenders can be categorized in some fashion has been around for as long as criminal behavior has been studied. The potential for specialization continues to be a question of some importance in contemporary criminological theory and justice policy. The ongoing study of criminal careers has led to a great deal of further research in this area. Still, many scholars believe that offenders commit criminal acts based on desire for short-term pleasure and do not regularly engage in specific patterns of offenses. A variety of research methods and analytic approaches have been used to examine this research topic; some focus on offense patterns across groups of offenders, and others attempt to assess specialization and diversity of offending at the individual level. Empirical research tends to suggest that the majority of offenders generalize over the course of their active criminal careers. This raises some questions about theories, policies, and treatment modalities that assume offender types.

Some recent evidence, however, suggests that offenders may specialize during short time periods of their overall careers. Therefore, it is important that further research on specialization accommodate the fact that most offenders will commit a variety of different types of crime over their careers, but the specific nature of those activities may be tied to particular life events and situations. Emerging measurement strategies and analytic techniques offer some opportunity to better understand this property of criminal careers. Incorporating these approaches with greater emphasis on theoretical understanding has the potential to advance knowledge of the degree to which criminal specialization exists and its origins. This area of criminological study has some important implications for how offenders are sanctioned and treated by the justice system as well and should be pursued further to inform responses to crime.

Browse criminal justice research papers or view criminal justice research topics.


  1. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Das, S., & Moitra, S. D. (1988). Specialization and seriousness during adult criminal careers. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4, 303–345.
  2. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J. A., & Visher, C. (Eds.). (1986). Criminal careers and “career criminals”: Vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  3. Britt, C. L. (1994). Versatility. In T. Hirschi & M. Gottfredson (Eds.), The generality of deviance (pp. 173–192). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  4. Britt, C. L. (1996). The measurement of specialization and escalation in the criminal career: An alternate modeling strategy. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 12, 193–222.
  5. Bursik, R. J. (1980). The dynamics of specialization in juvenile offenses. Social Forces, 58, 851–864.
  6. Chaiken, J. M., & Chaiken, M. (1982). Varieties of criminal behavior. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
  7. Cloward, R., & Ohlin, L. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs. New York: Free Press.
  8. DeLisi, M. (2003). The imprisoned non-violent drug offender: Specialized martyr or versatile career criminal? American Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 167–182.
  9. Farrington, D. P. (1986). Age and crime. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 7, pp. 189–250). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  10. Farrington, D. P., Snyder, H. N., & Finnegan, T. A. (1988). Specialization in juvenile court careers. Criminology, 26, 461–485.
  11. Francis, B., Soothill, K., & Fligelstone, R. (2004). Identifying patterns and pathways of offending behaviour: A new approach to typologies of crime. European Journal of Criminology, 1, 47–87.
  12. Gibbons, D. C. (1988). Some critical observations on criminal types and criminal careers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 8–23.
  13. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  14. Kempf-Leonard, K. (1987). Specialization and the criminal career. Criminology, 25, 399–420.
  15. Lieb, R., Quinsey, V., & Berliner, L. (1998). Sexual predators and social policy. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 23, pp. 43–114). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  16. Lussier, P. (2005). The criminal activity of sexual offenders in adulthood: Revisiting the specialization debate. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 269–292.
  17. Lynam, D., Piquero, A. R., & Moffitt, T. E. (2004). Specialization and the propensity to violence: Support from self-reports but not official records. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20, 215–228.
  18. Matson, S., & Lieb, R. (1997). Megan’s Law: A review of state and federal legislation. Olympia:Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
  19. Mazerolle, P., Brame, R., Paternoster, R., Piquero, A. R., & Dean, C. (2000). Onset age, persistence, and offending versatility: Comparisons across gender. Criminology, 38, 1143–1172.
  20. McGloin, J. M., Sullivan, C. J., Piquero, A. R., & Pratt, T. C. (2007). Explaining qualitative change in offending: Revisiting specialization in the short-term. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 321–346.
  21. Miethe, T., Olson, J., & Mitchell, O. (2007). Specialization and persistence in the arrest histories of sex offenders: A comparative analysis of alternate measures and offense types. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 204–229.
  22. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescent-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.
  23. Osgood, D.W. (2005). Making sense of crime and the life course. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602, 196–211.
  24. Osgood, D.W., & Schreck, C. J. (2007). A new method for studying the extent, stability, and predictors of individual specialization in violence. Criminology, 45, 273–312.
  25. Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Piquero, A. R., Mazerolle, P., & Dean, C. W. (1998). The forward specialization coefficient: Distributional properties and subgroup differences. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 133–154.
  26. Piquero, A. R. (2000). Frequency, specialization, and violence in offending careers. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 392–418.
  27. Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., & Blumstein, A. (2003). The criminal career paradigm. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 30, pp. 359–506). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  28. Piquero, A. R., Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Dean, C. W. (1999). Onset age and specialization in offending behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36, 235–274.
  29. Shover, N. (1996). Great pretenders: Pursuits and careers of persistent thieves. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  30. Simon, L. M. J. (1997). Do offenders specialize in crime types? Applied and Preventive Psychology, 6, 35–53.
  31. Sullivan, C. J., McGloin, J. M., Pratt, T. C., & Piquero, A. R. (2006). Rethinking the “norm” of offender generality: Investigating specialization in the short-term. Criminology, 44, 205–240.
  32. Wolfgang, M., Figlio, R., & Sellin, T. (1972). Delinquency in a birth cohort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.