The Police

VIII. Conclusion

Increased interaction with the community, greater accountability within the police force and to the public, as well as technological advances will all increase and will ultimately have an effect on the police function and how it is carried out. As officers are provided with more time and resources, allowing them to interact more positively with citizens, the police will likely recognize the constructive results of these contacts. Innovative approaches to community mobilization should be designed to empower citizens and build trust in the government. Clearly, the application of technology will provide unique and innovative means of identifying, creating, and updating blueprints for resolving the many problems faced by the police.

Browse criminal justice research papers or view criminal justice research topics.


  1. Alpert, G., & Dunham, R. (2004). Understanding police use of force: Officers, suspects, and reciprocity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Alpert, G., Kenney, D., Dunham, R., & Smith, W. (2000). Police pursuits: What we know. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
  3. Alpert, G., MacDonald, J., & Dunham, R. (2005). Police suspicion and discretionary decision making during citizen stops. Criminology, 43, 407–434.
  4. Bayley, D. H. (1998). Policing in America: Assessments and prospects. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
  5. Bayley, D. H. (1999). Policing: The world stage. In R. Mawby (Ed.), Policing across the world: Issues for the twenty-first century (pp. 3–22). London: UCL Press.
  6. Brenner, A. (1989). Psychological screening of police applicants. In R. G. Dunham & G. P. Alpert (Eds.), Critical issues in policing: Contemporary readings (pp. 72–86). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
  7. Caiden, G. (1977). Police revitalization. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  8. Davis, K. C. (1975). Police discretion. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
  9. Greenwood, P.W., & Petersilia, J. (1975). The criminal investigation process: Summary and policy implications. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
  10. Langworthy, R. H., & Travis, L. F. (2002). Policing in America: A balance of forces (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  11. Martin, S. (2001). Female officers on the move? A status report of women in policing. In R. G. Dunham & G. P. Alpert (Eds.), Critical issues in policing: Contemporary readings (4th ed., pp. 401–422). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
  12. Miller, W. R. (1977). Cops and bobbies: Police authority in New York and London, 1830–1870. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  13. National Center for Women in Policing. (2002). Men, women, and police excessive force: A tale of two genders. A content analysis of civil liability cases, sustained allegations, and citizen complaints. Los Angeles: Author.
  14. National Research Council. (2003). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  15. Reith, C. (1938). The police idea: Its history and evolution in England in the eighteenth century and after. London: Oxford University Press.
  16. Reith, C. (1956). A new study of police history. Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver & Boyd.
  17. Rubinstein, J. (1973). City police. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
  18. Stead, P. (1985). The police of Britain. London: Macmillan. Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985).
  19. Uchida, C. D. (1997). The development of the American police: An historical overview. In R. G. Dunham & G. P. Alpert (Eds.), Critical issues in policing: Contemporary readings (3rd ed., pp. 18–35). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
  20. Van Maanen, J. (1978). Observations on the making of policemen. In P. K. Manning & J. Van Maanen (Eds.), Policing: A view from the street (pp. 292–308). Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
  21. Walker, S. (1983). The police in America: An introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  22. Wilson, J. Q. (1968). Varieties of police behavior: The management of law and order in eight communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.