Problem-Solving Courts


I. Introduction

II. The Problem-Solving Court Movement

A. History of Development

B. Objectives of Problem-Solving Courts

C. Why Problem-Solving Courts Are Important

III. Problem-Solving Courts Compared With Traditional Courts

IV. Types of Problem-Solving Courts

V. Research on Problem-Solving Courts

A. Drug Court Evaluations

B. Domestic Violence Court Evaluations

C. Mental Health Court Evaluations

D. Community Court Evaluations

E. Evaluations of Other Problem-Solving Courts

VI. Future Directions, Conclusion, and Bibliography

I. Introduction

Problem-solving courts, also called specialty courts, are a fairly recent, but rapidly growing development in the American criminal court system. Problem-solving courts are specialized courts that develop expertise in particular social problems, such as addiction, domestic violence, or family dysfunction, because their caseloads consist primarily of these types of criminal cases (Dorf & Fagan, 2003). The first of them was a drug court created in Dade County, Florida, in 1989 (Jeffries, 2005). Besides drug courts, the most common types of problem-solving courts are domestic violence courts, mental health courts, and community courts (Casey & Rottman, 2005).

While not all problem-solving courts are the same, they share common elements that distinguish them from traditional courts. First, they use judicial authority to address chronic social problems. Second, they go beyond simple adjudication of cases and attempt to change the future behavior of defendants through judicial supervision of therapeutic treatment. Finally, they work collaboratively with other criminal justice agencies, community groups, and social service providers to accomplish particular social outcomes, such as low recidivism, safer family environment, and increased sobriety (Berman & Feinblatt, 2001).

Browse criminal justice research papers or view criminal justice research topics.