Street Gangs

VIII. Conclusion

Understanding gangs and the control of their behavior has become much more complex as a result of social change at global, national, and local levels. Immigration continues to change the face of this country, as people come from all over the world in search of a better life. Most will be welcomed and assimilate rapidly, adding to the growth of the country and American culture. Some will do much worse, contributing to and confirming stereotypes that both fuel and reflect intergroup conflict and competition over scarce resources.

To young people facing the impacts of such broad changes in society, in school, at home, on the streets, and in their communities, gangs represent an attractive means by which to negotiate and capitalize on their daily lives. In return for the often high, sometimes deadly, costs of “putting work in,” gangs offer protection, friendship and belonging, status, and material comforts. David Brotherton (2008), long-time student of the Almighty Latin King and Queen Nation street gang in New York, suggests that gangs also provide members and associates with opportunities for political resistance against oppression and social control. This contrasts sharply with the history of Latino gangs elsewhere, and with the work of Thrasher (and Asbury before him), who documented the participation of white ethnic street gangs in the service of politicians in Chicago and New York. Latino and white gang histories, in turn, contrast with the history of failed attempts by black street gangs to achieve political power. Despite the apparently sincere efforts of some gang leaders and their followers to “go conservative,” continued violent and other types of criminal behavior by gangs and their members made them easy targets for Chicago officials threatened by the prospect of politically organized black gangs.

Whatever their consequences for the politicization of gangs, it is clear that arrest, prosecution, and incarceration did not make gangs go away back then, and they are unlikely to do so today. These are strategies for dealing with the problem of individuals. Gangs are part of ongoing processes played out in the lives of young people, but heavily influenced by the world around them. Insight into these processes has been slow to develop, but decades of hard work have brought them into much clearer focus. More hard work is needed, however, to bridge levels of explanation and existing gaps in knowledge. Problems of youth violence and troublesome youth groups (including street gangs), and what to do about them, will always be present. The least that can be done is to try to better understand them.

Browse criminal justice research papers or view criminal justice research topics.


  1. The ERP consensus definition is this: “A gang is any durable, street-oriented youth group whose involvement in illegal activity is part of its group identity” (Klein & Maxson, 2006, p. 4). Although durability is subjective, this stipulation is meant to distinguish street gangs from ad hoc groups or milling crowds that engage in delinquent, criminal, or other types of troublesome behaviors.
  2. Recent estimates place the number of gangs in the United States at 24,000, with approximately 760,000 active members in 2,900 jurisdictions (Egley, Howell, & Major, 2004).


  1. Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: Norton.
  2. Anderson, E. (Ed.). (2008). Against the wall: Poor, young, black, and male. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  3. Asbury, H. (1927). The gangs of New York. New York: Capricorn Books.
  4. Brotherton, D. C. (2008). Beyond social reproduction: Bringing resistance back in gang theory. Theoretical Criminology, 12, 55–77.
  5. Bulmer, M. (1984). The Chicago School of sociology: Institutionalization, diversity, and the rise of sociological research. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  6. Castells, M. (2000). End of millennium. The information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. 3, 2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  7. Cloward, R. A., & Ohlin, L. E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  8. Cohen, A. K. (1955). Delinquent boys. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  9. Egley, A., Jr., Howell, J. C., & Major, A. K. (2004). Recent patterns of gang problems in the United States: Results from the 1996– 2002 National Youth Gang Survey. In F. A. Esbensen, S. G. Tibbetts, & L. Gaines (Eds.), American youth gangs at the millennium (pp. 90–108). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
  10. England, R. W., Jr. (1965). Book review: The Violent Gang. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 638–639.
  11. Fleisher, M. S. (1998). Dead end kids: Gang girls and the boys they know. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  12. Hagedorn, J. M. (1988). People and folks: Gangs, crime, and the underclass in a rustbelt city. Chicago: Lakeview Press.
  13. Hagedorn, J. M. (2008). A world of gangs: Armed young men and gangsta rap. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  14. Homeboy Industries:
  15. Horowitz, R. R. (1983). Honor and the American dream: Culture and identity in a Chicano community. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  16. Hughes, L. A., & Short, J. F., Jr. (2006). Gangs and unions: Civil and criminal remedies. Trends in Organized Crime, 9, 43–59.
  17. Jacobs, J. B. (1977). Statesville. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  18. Klein, M. W. (1969). Gang cohesiveness, delinquency, and a street-work program. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 6, 135–166.
  19. Klein, M.W. (1971). Street gangs and street workers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  20. Klein, M. W., & Maxson, C. L. (2006). Street gang patterns and policies. New York: Oxford University Press.
  21. McKay, H. D. (1969). Rates of delinquents and commitments: Discussion and conclusions. In C. R. Shaw & H. D. McKay (Eds.), Juvenile delinquency and urban areas (pp. 329–388). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  22. Miller, W. B. (1958). Lower-class culture as a generating milieu of gang delinquency. Journal of Social Issues, 14(3), 5–19.
  23. Miller, W. B. (1976). Youth gangs in the urban crisis era. In J. F. Short, Jr. (Ed.), Delinquency, crime, and society (pp. 91–128). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  24. Moore, J. W. (1978). Homeboys: Gangs, drugs, and prison in the barrios of Los Angeles. Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
  25. Papachristos, A.V. (2005). Interpreting inkblots: Deciphering and doing something about modern street gangs. Criminology & Public Policy, 4, 643–652.
  26. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633–660.
  27. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.
  28. Sharkey, P. T. (2006). Navigating dangerous streets: The sources and consequences of street efficacy. American Sociological Review, 71, 826–846.
  29. Short, J. F., Jr., & Moland, J., Jr. (1976). Politics and youth gangs: A follow-up study. Sociological Quarterly, 17, 162–179.
  30. Short, J. F., Jr., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1965). Group process and gang delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  31. Spergel, I. A. (1964). Racketville, Slumtown, Haulburg: An exploratory study of delinquent subcultures. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  32. Spergel, I. A. (2007). Reducing youth gang violence: The Little Village Gang Project in Chicago. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
  33. Sullivan, M. L. (1989). Getting paid: Youth crime and work in the inner city. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  34. Sullivan, M. L. (2006). Are gang studies “dangerous”?Youth violence, local context, and the problem of reification. In J. F. Short, Jr., & L. A. Hughes (Eds.), Studying youth gangs (pp. 15–35). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
  35. Suttles, G. D. (1968). The social order of the slum: Ethnicity and territory in the inner city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  36. Thrasher, F. M. (1927). The gang: A study of 1,313 gangs in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  37. Venkatesh, S. A. (2000). American project: The rise and fall of an American ghetto. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  38. Venkatesh, S. A. (2006). Off the books: The underground economy of the urban poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  39. Venkatesh, S. A. (2008). Gang leader for a day: A rogue sociologist takes to the streets. New York: Penguin Group.
  40. Venkatesh, S. A., & Kasimir, R. (Eds.). (2007). Youth, globalization, and the law. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  41. Venkatesh, S. A., & Murphy, A. K. (2007). Policing ourselves: Law and order in the American ghetto. In S. A. Venkatesh & R. Kasimir (Eds.), Youth, globalization, and the law (pp. 124–157). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  42. Vigil, J. D. (1988). Barrio gangs: Street life and identity in Southern California. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  43. Wilson, W. J. (1978). The declining significance of race: Blacks and changing American institutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  44. Wilson,W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  45. Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Knopf.
  46. Yablonsky, L. (1962). The violent gang. New York: Penguin.
  47. Zilberg, E. (2007). Refugee gang youth: Zero tolerance and the security state in contemporary U.S.–Salvadoran Relations. In S.A. Venkatesh & R. Kasimir (Eds.), Youth, globalization, and the law (pp. 61–89). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.