Wrongful Convictions

VI. Conclusion

In 20 years, wrongful conviction has gone from a little-noted phenomenon to an important topic within criminal justice. The number of innocence projects working to exonerate prisoners has grown from 1 or 2 in the early 1990s to about 50 today. Partly as a result of their policy advocacy, innocence reforms have been enacted. Congress passed the Innocence Protection Act in 2004, providing funding for state postconviction DNA testing, encouraging states to pass postconviction DNA testing laws, and raising the annual compensation for exonerated federal prisoners to $50,000 for each year of imprisonment. More than 40 states have passed postconviction testing laws. Six states and hundreds of police departments have required videotaping of interrogations. Seven states and a growing number of police departments have established eyewitness identification reforms. North Carolina created the first innocence inquiry commission that reviews wrongful convictions claims and presents successful claims to a special court.

The investigation of wrongful convictions, which challenge the fairness and accuracy of the criminal justice system, are becoming a necessary feature of criminal justice analysis. The adoption of innocence reforms will not only reduce this kind of injustice but will also improve the quality and professionalism of criminal justice participants.

Browse criminal justice research papers or view criminal justice research topics.

Bibliography:

  1. Baumgartner, F. R., DeBoef, S. L., & Boydstun, A. E. (2008). The decline of the death penalty and the discovery of innocence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Bedau, H. A., & Radelet, M. L. (1988). The myth of infallibility: A reply to Markman and Cassell (Response to a critique ordered by Attorney General Edwin Meese). Stanford Law Review, 41, 161–170.
  3. Cole, S. A. (2001). Suspect identities: A history of fingerprinting and criminal identification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  4. Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Mistaken identification: The eyewitness, psychology, and the law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Doyle, J. M. (2005). True witness: Cops, courts, science, and the battle against misidentification. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  6. Findley, K. A., & Scott, M. S. (2006). The multiple dimensions of tunnel vision in criminal cases. Wisconsin Law Review, 2, 291–397.
  7. Fisher, S. Z. (1993). “Just the facts, ma’am”: Lying and the omission of exculpatory evidence in police reports. New England Law Review, 28, 1–62.
  8. Forst, B. (2004). Errors of justice: Nature, sources, and remedies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Garrett, B. L. (2008). Judging innocence. Columbia Law Review, 108, 55–141.
  10. Giannelli, P., & Raeder, M. (Eds.). (2006). Achieving justice: Freeing the innocent, convicting the guilty. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
  11. Gould, J. B. (2008). The innocence commission: Preventing wrongful convictions and restoring the criminal justice system. New York: New York University Press.
  12. Gross, S. R., Jacoby, K., Matheson, D. J., Montgomery, N., & Patil, S. (2005). Exonerations in the United States, 1989 through 2003. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 95, 523–560.
  13. Harmon, T. R. (2001). Predictors of miscarriages of justice in capital cases. Justice Quarterly, 18, 949–968.
  14. Huff, C. R., Rattner, A., & Sagarin, E. (1996). Convicted but innocent: Wrongful conviction and public policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  15. Leo, R. A. (2005). Rethinking the study of miscarriages of justice: Developing a criminology of wrongful conviction. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 201–223.
  16. Leo, R. A. (2008). Police interrogation and American justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  17. Loftus, E. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  18. Rabinowitz, D. (2003). No crueler tyrannies: Accusation, false witness and other terrors of our times. New York: Wall Street Journal Book.
  19. Radelet, M. L., Bedau, H. A., & Putnam, C. (1992). In spite of innocence. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
  20. Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2001). Actual innocence: When justice goes wrong and how to make it right. New York: Penguin/New American Library.
  21. Vollen, L., & Eggers, D. (Eds.). (2005). Surviving justice: America’s wrongfully convicted and exonerated. San Francisco: McSweeny’s Books.
  22. Weinberg, S., Gordon, N., &Williams, B. (2003). Harmful error: Investigating America’s local prosecutors. Washington, DC: Center for Public Integrity.
  23. Westervelt, S. D., & Humphrey, J. A. (Eds.). (2001). Wrongly convicted: Perspectives on failed justice. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  24. Zalman, M., Smith, B., & Kiger, A. (2008). Officials’ estimates of the incidence of “actual innocence” convictions. Justice Quarterly, 25, 72–100.