Autonomic nervous system and crime research examines psychophysiological measures, principally resting heart rate and skin conductance, that index sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system function and correlate consistently with antisocial and criminal behavior, constituting one of biosocial criminology’s most consistently replicated research literatures despite receiving comparatively less popular attention than the genetic, neuroimaging, and hormonal research examined in companion articles throughout this category. The central and counterintuitive finding within this literature, that antisocial individuals show reduced rather than heightened physiological arousal, parallels the low cortisol pattern examined in the companion hormones article and has motivated an influential underarousal theoretical framework proposing that antisocial behavior partly reflects individuals’ attempts to achieve optimal stimulation levels given a chronically underaroused baseline nervous system state. This article, part of Biological Theories of Crime within Criminology Theories, examines autonomic nervous system function and psychophysiological measurement methodology, the extensively replicated low resting heart rate finding, the theoretical frameworks proposed to explain this underarousal pattern, skin conductance research on fear conditioning and orienting responses, developmental and protective factor research, and the methodological considerations and prevention implications arising from this research tradition.
Psychophysiological research on crime offers a particular methodological advantage relative to some other biosocial criminology research traditions: autonomic nervous system measures, particularly resting heart rate, can be collected inexpensively, noninvasively, and rapidly across very large samples using equipment and protocols standardized within clinical medicine for entirely unrelated purposes, enabling researchers to assemble unusually large cumulative samples across numerous independent studies and thereby achieve considerable statistical power and cross-sample replication that has proven somewhat more elusive within neuroimaging and some genetic research traditions given their greater cost and logistical complexity.
This article proceeds through six sections: autonomic nervous system function and the psychophysiological measures researchers employ, the extensively documented low resting heart rate finding and its meta-analytic confirmation, the fearlessness and stimulation-seeking theoretical frameworks proposed to explain this underarousal pattern, skin conductance research examining fear conditioning and orienting responses, developmental research examining childhood psychophysiology and protective factors, and the methodological considerations and prevention implications this research tradition raises.
The Autonomic Nervous System and Psychophysiological Measurement
Sympathetic and Parasympathetic Function
The autonomic nervous system regulates involuntary physiological functions, including heart rate, blood pressure, and sweat gland activity, through two complementary branches: the sympathetic nervous system, generally associated with arousal and the mobilization of physiological resources in response to perceived threat or challenge, commonly termed the fight-or-flight response, and the parasympathetic nervous system, generally associated with rest, digestion, and physiological recovery following arousal (Cacioppo, Tassinary, & Berntson, 2007). Criminological psychophysiology research has examined both branches, though sympathetic nervous system measures, particularly heart rate and skin conductance, have received considerably more sustained research attention than parasympathetic measures specifically.
Resting heart rate, measured under calm, non-stressed baseline conditions, provides researchers a straightforward and clinically well-established index of overall autonomic arousal, with lower resting heart rate generally indicating reduced sympathetic nervous system activation or, alternatively, heightened parasympathetic dominance at rest, either physiological pattern consistent with an overall reduced baseline arousal state (Ortiz & Raine, 2004). Skin conductance, measuring the skin’s electrical conductivity as modulated by sweat gland activity under exclusively sympathetic nervous system control, provides a complementary arousal measure particularly sensitive to acute emotional and orienting responses to specific stimuli, distinct from resting heart rate’s more general baseline arousal indication.
Heart rate variability, a more recently emphasized psychophysiological measure capturing the beat-to-beat variation in heart rate that reflects parasympathetic, and particularly vagal, regulatory influence on cardiac function, has attracted increasing criminological research attention as a potentially more nuanced index of autonomic regulatory capacity than resting heart rate alone, since heart rate variability specifically indexes the nervous system’s capacity for flexible physiological regulation rather than merely its resting activation level (Beauchaine, 2001).
Common Psychophysiological Measures in Criminology
Beyond resting heart rate and skin conductance, criminological psychophysiology research has employed several additional measures, including electroencephalographic indices of cortical arousal (Gao, Raine, Venables, Dawson, & Mednick, 2010), startle reflex modulation assessing emotional reactivity to aversive stimuli, and cardiovascular reactivity measuring heart rate change in response to acute stressors or challenges, each measure providing a somewhat distinct window onto autonomic and central nervous system arousal regulation relevant to understanding antisocial behavior’s psychophysiological correlates (Ortiz & Raine, 2004). This methodological diversity has allowed researchers to examine whether the underarousal pattern documented most extensively for resting heart rate generalizes across multiple independent psychophysiological indices or instead reflects a more measure-specific phenomenon.
Psychophysiological measurement’s practical accessibility, requiring only inexpensive, portable, and noninvasive equipment compared to neuroimaging technology, has enabled criminological psychophysiology research to draw upon unusually large sample sizes, including several prospective longitudinal birth cohort studies following thousands of children from early childhood into adulthood while periodically assessing psychophysiological function alongside behavioral outcomes, a methodological advantage that has substantially strengthened this research tradition’s statistical power and capacity for longitudinal causal inference compared to some other biosocial criminology research areas.
Standardized measurement protocols, including consistent resting periods prior to baseline heart rate assessment and controlled laboratory conditions minimizing extraneous arousal-inducing stimuli, have become increasingly established within contemporary psychophysiological criminology research, addressing methodological inconsistencies that characterized some earlier research and contributing to the considerable cross-study consistency that meta-analytic synthesis of this literature has documented.
Table 1. Psychophysiological Measures in Criminological Research
| Measure | Nervous System Branch | What It Indexes | Typical Finding in Antisocial Samples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resting Heart Rate | Sympathetic/parasympathetic balance | Overall baseline arousal | Lower resting heart rate |
| Skin Conductance (baseline) | Sympathetic only | Baseline sympathetic activation | Lower baseline conductance |
| Skin Conductance (orienting response) | Sympathetic only | Response to novel or threatening stimuli | Reduced orienting response magnitude |
| Heart Rate Variability | Primarily parasympathetic (vagal) | Regulatory flexibility | Mixed findings; area of ongoing research |
| Startle Reflex Modulation | Central and autonomic integration | Emotional reactivity to aversive stimuli | Reduced potentiation to fear-relevant stimuli |
Resting Heart Rate and Antisocial Behavior
The Low Resting Heart Rate Finding
Low resting heart rate stands as psychophysiological criminology’s single most consistently replicated finding, with numerous independent studies across varying samples, age groups, and cultural contexts documenting that children, adolescents, and adults exhibiting antisocial and aggressive behavior show measurably lower resting heart rate than non-antisocial comparison samples, a finding first systematically documented in the criminological literature during the 1970s (Wadsworth, 1976) and subsequently replicated with remarkable consistency across the following decades (Raine, 2013). This finding proves particularly notable for its consistency across studies employing markedly different antisocial behavior definitions, measurement approaches, and sample characteristics, a cross-study consistency considerably stronger than characterizes many other biosocial criminology findings examined throughout this category.
The low resting heart rate finding holds across the full severity spectrum of antisocial behavior, from milder conduct problems in general population samples through severe, persistent antisocial behavior in clinical and forensic samples, though the association’s magnitude appears somewhat stronger for more severe and persistent antisocial presentations, paralleling the broader pattern in which biological correlates generally show stronger association with severe, life-course-persistent antisocial trajectories than with milder or more transient antisocial behavior (Ortiz & Raine, 2004).
This finding’s specificity to antisocial behavior, rather than reflecting a more generic marker of general psychopathology, has been established through research comparing antisocial samples against clinical comparison groups presenting with other psychiatric conditions, generally finding that low resting heart rate associates specifically with antisocial and aggressive behavior rather than representing a nonspecific correlate of childhood psychiatric difficulty broadly, strengthening confidence that the finding reflects a genuine, behaviorally specific physiological correlate rather than a more generic marker of clinical distress.
Meta-Analytic Confirmation Across Samples
Adrian Raine’s influential meta-analytic synthesis, examining resting heart rate across numerous independent studies encompassing thousands of participants, confirmed the low resting heart rate finding’s consistency across the accumulated research literature, finding a statistically significant and meaningfully sized effect that has since been replicated in subsequent meta-analytic updates incorporating additional research published since Raine’s original synthesis (Ortiz & Raine, 2004). This meta-analytic confirmation across an unusually large cumulative sample, benefiting from psychophysiological measurement’s practical accessibility discussed earlier in this article, provides particularly strong evidentiary grounding compared to biosocial criminology findings resting on smaller, more logistically constrained research literatures.
Subsequent meta-analytic research has additionally found that the low resting heart rate finding replicates across diverse cultural and national contexts, including samples drawn from North America, Europe, and Asia, providing evidence against the possibility that this finding reflects some culturally specific artifact rather than a more generalizable biological correlate of antisocial behavior (Portnoy & Farrington, 2015). This cross-cultural replication strengthens confidence in the finding’s fundamental biological grounding rather than any culturally contingent measurement or interpretive artifact specific to any single research tradition or national context.
The low resting heart rate finding’s methodological and statistical consistency has established it as biosocial criminology’s paradigmatic example of a well-replicated biological correlate of antisocial behavior, frequently cited within contemporary criminology textbooks and research literature as among the field’s most methodologically secure biological findings, a status that contrasts somewhat with the more mixed replication record characterizing some other biosocial criminology findings examined throughout this category, including several genetic and neuroimaging associations.
Theoretical Explanations for the Low Arousal Finding
The Fearlessness Theory
The fearlessness theory proposes that low resting heart rate reflects reduced fear and anxiety, since heart rate typically increases in anticipation of threatening or punishing circumstances, such that individuals with chronically low resting heart rate may experience reduced anticipatory fear response to potential punishment or negative social consequences, potentially reducing the behavioral inhibition that fear of consequences ordinarily exerts on risky or norm-violating behavior in typically developing individuals (Raine, 2013). This fearlessness interpretation connects directly to the amygdala dysfunction and impaired fear conditioning findings examined in the companion brain abnormalities article, since both research traditions converge theoretically on reduced fear and threat sensitivity as a central mechanism potentially underlying severe antisocial and psychopathic behavior specifically.
Fearlessness theory draws additional support from research finding that low resting heart rate associates particularly strongly with the callous-unemotional and psychopathic personality features examined throughout this category’s neuroscience-focused articles, rather than with antisocial behavior more broadly defined, a specificity pattern consistent with fearlessness theory’s emphasis on reduced fear and anxiety as the specific underlying mechanism, since callous-unemotional traits specifically involve diminished emotional and fear responsiveness rather than antisocial behavior’s full, heterogeneous phenotypic range (Fanti, Panayiotou, Lazarou, Michael, & Georgiou, 2016; Frick, Ray, Thornton, & Kahn, 2014).
This fearlessness framework carries important developmental implications, since it suggests that children exhibiting unusually low resting heart rate from an early age, well before significant antisocial behavior has emerged, might represent an identifiable early marker of heightened risk for later severe antisocial and psychopathic trajectories, a possibility that has motivated the developmental psychophysiological research examined later in this article.
The Stimulation-Seeking Theory
The stimulation-seeking theory offers an alternative, though not mutually exclusive, explanation for the low arousal finding, proposing that chronically low autonomic arousal represents an inherently unpleasant physiological state that motivates affected individuals to actively seek stimulation, including through risky, exciting, or norm-violating behavior, as a means of elevating their arousal toward a more optimal or subjectively comfortable level (Raine, 2013). This theoretical framework draws on broader psychological sensation-seeking theory, which proposes that individuals vary in their optimal preferred arousal level and consequently in their motivation to seek out arousal-inducing experiences, extending this general personality framework specifically to explain low resting heart rate’s association with antisocial and risk-taking behavior (Zuckerman, 1994).
Stimulation-seeking theory receives support from research documenting that low resting heart rate associates not only with antisocial behavior specifically but with a broader constellation of sensation-seeking and risk-taking behaviors, including substance use and risky recreational activities, suggesting that low arousal may motivate a more generalized pattern of stimulation-seeking behavior of which criminal conduct represents merely one possible manifestation among several available stimulation-seeking behavioral pathways (Sijtsema, Veenstra, Lindenberg, van Roon, Verhulst, Ormel, & Riese, 2010).
The fearlessness and stimulation-seeking theories, while theoretically distinct in their proposed underlying mechanism, reduced fear response versus motivated arousal-seeking respectively, are not mutually exclusive and may operate simultaneously or apply differentially across different antisocial behavior subtypes and individuals, with some researchers proposing that fearlessness may particularly explain callous-unemotional and psychopathic presentations while stimulation-seeking may better explain more general risk-taking and sensation-seeking-driven antisocial behavior lacking the specific callous-unemotional features that fearlessness theory addresses most directly (Portnoy & Farrington, 2015).
Table 2. Fearlessness Versus Stimulation-Seeking Theoretical Frameworks
| Feature | Fearlessness Theory | Stimulation-Seeking Theory |
|---|---|---|
| Core Mechanism | Reduced anticipatory fear of punishment | Motivated pursuit of optimal arousal level |
| Best Explains | Callous-unemotional and psychopathic traits | General risk-taking and sensation-seeking behavior |
| Predicted Behavioral Pattern | Reduced behavioral inhibition to threat cues | Active pursuit of exciting or risky stimuli |
| Related Neuroscience Finding | Amygdala and fear conditioning deficits | Reward system and novelty-seeking research |
| Developmental Implication | Early marker for psychopathic trajectory | Early marker for general risk-taking trajectory |
Skin Conductance and Fear Conditioning
Electrodermal Activity and Orienting Responses
Skin conductance research has documented that antisocial and psychopathic individuals show reduced orienting responses, the initial physiological reaction to novel or potentially significant stimuli, compared to non-antisocial comparison samples, a reduced orienting response pattern interpreted as reflecting diminished attentional and physiological engagement with environmental stimuli that would ordinarily capture typically developing individuals’ attention and concern (Lorber, 2004). This reduced orienting response finding complements the resting heart rate research examined earlier in this article, providing convergent evidence from a methodologically distinct psychophysiological measure supporting the broader underarousal theoretical framework.
Michael Lorber’s meta-analytic synthesis of skin conductance research found consistent though somewhat more modest effect sizes than the parallel resting heart rate literature, with reduced skin conductance reactivity associating with antisocial behavior across childhood, adolescent, and adult samples, though with greater heterogeneity across studies than the more consistently replicated heart rate findings, potentially reflecting skin conductance measurement’s greater sensitivity to situational and methodological variation across different research protocols (Lorber, 2004).
Skin conductance research has proven particularly valuable for investigating fear conditioning specifically, since electrodermal response provides a sensitive index of the conditioned fear response that classical fear conditioning experimental paradigms are specifically designed to elicit and measure, complementing the behavioral fear conditioning research examined in the companion brain abnormalities article’s discussion of amygdala function.
Fear Conditioning Deficits in Psychopathy
Skin conductance-based fear conditioning research has documented that psychopathic individuals show impaired conditioned fear responses, failing to develop the normal anticipatory skin conductance response to a stimulus previously paired with an aversive outcome that typically developing individuals readily acquire through standard fear conditioning experimental procedures, a deficit interpreted as reflecting the amygdala-mediated fear conditioning impairment examined in greater neuroanatomical detail within the companion brain abnormalities article (Birbaumer et al., 2005). This fear conditioning deficit research provides a particularly direct behavioral demonstration of the reduced fear responsiveness that both the fearlessness theory and the amygdala dysfunction literature propose as central to psychopathic and severely antisocial behavior.
Niels Birbaumer and colleagues’ combined skin conductance and neuroimaging research found that psychopathic individuals’ impaired fear conditioning corresponded with reduced amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex activation during the fear conditioning procedure specifically, providing convergent psychophysiological and neuroimaging evidence for a shared underlying neural mechanism linking reduced skin conductance fear responses to the specific brain regions that structural and functional neuroimaging research has independently implicated in psychopathic emotional processing deficits (Birbaumer et al., 2005).
This convergence across skin conductance, neuroimaging, and behavioral fear conditioning research exemplifies contemporary biosocial criminology’s increasingly integrated multi-method approach, in which findings from methodologically distinct research traditions, psychophysiology, neuroimaging, and behavioral experimentation, converge to build a considerably stronger cumulative case for specific theoretical mechanisms than any single research approach could establish independently.
Developmental and Protective Factors
Childhood Psychophysiology as an Early Marker
Longitudinal research measuring resting heart rate and other psychophysiological indices in early childhood, well before significant antisocial behavior has typically emerged, has found that low childhood resting heart rate predicts subsequent antisocial behavior across adolescence and into adulthood, providing evidence that the low arousal pattern precedes rather than merely results from antisocial behavior and its social consequences (Raine, Venables, & Mednick, 1997). Adrian Raine and colleagues’ prospective longitudinal research, examining resting heart rate measured at age three in relation to antisocial outcomes assessed at age eleven, found that low childhood resting heart rate predicted subsequent aggressive behavior independent of numerous social and family risk factors measured concurrently, providing particularly strong evidence against the reverse causation concerns that complicate causal interpretation within cross-sectional psychophysiological research.
This longitudinal predictive evidence addresses a methodological concern paralleling the reverse causation challenges examined throughout this category’s neuroscience and endocrine research articles, since demonstrating that psychophysiological differences precede rather than merely follow antisocial behavior onset provides considerably stronger support for genuine causal or developmental contribution than cross-sectional research comparing already-antisocial and non-antisocial samples at a single time point can offer.
The identification of low resting heart rate as an early, measurable childhood marker of heightened antisocial behavior risk has generated considerable interest in psychophysiological screening’s potential prevention applications, though such applications raise important ethical considerations regarding stigmatization and labeling effects paralleling concerns raised regarding genetic and neuroimaging risk marker research examined throughout this category, concerns that counsel caution regarding premature translation of population-level predictive research into individual-level screening practice.
High Arousal as a Protective Factor Against Adversity
Complementing the low arousal risk research, several studies have found that children exhibiting relatively higher psychophysiological arousal, including higher resting heart rate and skin conductance, show reduced antisocial behavior risk even when exposed to significant environmental adversity, including family disruption or socioeconomic disadvantage, suggesting that higher autonomic arousal may function as a protective factor buffering against environmental risk exposure rather than merely representing the simple statistical inverse of the low arousal risk pattern (Raine, 2013). This protective factor framing extends the underarousal theoretical model beyond a purely risk-focused framework toward a more complete dimensional understanding in which autonomic arousal level relates to antisocial behavior risk across its full range rather than reflecting a simple categorical distinction between low-risk and high-risk arousal states.
This protective factor research carries meaningful implications for understanding differential susceptibility to environmental risk more broadly, suggesting that psychophysiological arousal level may function similarly to the gene-environment interaction patterns examined throughout this category’s genetics-focused articles, in which biological factors moderate individual sensitivity to environmental circumstances rather than operating as independent, environmentally invariant risk factors.
The identification of protective psychophysiological factors alongside the more extensively documented risk factors provides a more complete and nuanced picture of autonomic arousal’s relationship to antisocial behavior, consistent with contemporary biosocial criminology’s broader theoretical commitment to understanding biological factors as operating along a continuous risk-protective dimension interacting substantially with environmental circumstances rather than as simple categorical risk markers operating independently of context.
Methodological Issues and Applications
Measurement Confounds and Contextual Influences
Resting heart rate and other psychophysiological measures show substantial responsiveness to situational and lifestyle factors independent of any underlying trait-like arousal difference, including physical fitness level, since cardiovascular fitness training generally reduces resting heart rate independent of any psychological or behavioral difference (Latvala, Kuja-Halkola, Rickert, Lichtenstein, & Fazel, 2015), medication use, caffeine and substance consumption, and even the specific laboratory or clinical context in which measurement occurs, generating potential confounds that psychophysiological research must carefully address through standardized measurement protocols and appropriate statistical control (Ortiz & Raine, 2004). Physical fitness represents a particularly important potential confound given documented associations between physical activity level and both cardiovascular fitness and, independently, behavioral and psychological outcomes, requiring careful statistical disentangling within psychophysiological criminology research.
Body size and composition additionally influence resting heart rate independent of psychological arousal state, with research finding that controlling for height, weight, and body mass index somewhat attenuates but does not eliminate the low resting heart rate-antisocial behavior association, suggesting that body composition-related confounding, while a genuine methodological concern, does not fully account for the documented psychophysiological findings (Ortiz & Raine, 2004).
Measurement standardization concerns, including consistent resting period duration prior to baseline assessment and controlled ambient laboratory conditions, have become increasingly addressed within contemporary psychophysiological criminology research protocols, though methodological variation across studies employing different specific measurement procedures likely contributes to some of the effect size heterogeneity documented within meta-analytic synthesis of this literature.
Prevention Implications of Psychophysiological Research
Psychophysiological research on crime has motivated some prevention-oriented applied research, including investigation of whether interventions designed to increase children’s arousal or stimulation levels, including structured physical activity or enriched environmental stimulation programming, might reduce subsequent antisocial behavior risk among children identified as exhibiting the low arousal risk profile examined throughout this article, an intervention approach directly derived from the stimulation-seeking theoretical framework’s implication that providing adequate legitimate stimulation might reduce motivation toward antisocial stimulation-seeking specifically (Raine, 2013). Preliminary intervention research in this domain remains considerably less extensive and methodologically mature than the underlying risk factor research it aims to translate into practice, though early findings have generated some encouraging preliminary evidence supporting environmental enrichment’s potential protective value.
Adrian Raine and colleagues’ influential Mauritius Child Health Project, examining environmental enrichment intervention effects on subsequent antisocial behavior and psychophysiological function among a large community sample, found that early environmental enrichment, including nutritional supplementation, physical exercise, and cognitive stimulation programming, associated with reduced antisocial behavior and altered psychophysiological profiles measured years later, providing suggestive though not fully experimentally definitive evidence for environmental intervention’s potential to modify the biological risk factors examined throughout this article (Raine, Mellingen, Liu, Venables, & Mednick, 2003).
This prevention-oriented research direction exemplifies contemporary biosocial criminology’s broader interpretive framework, emphasizing biological risk factors’ potential modifiability through appropriate environmental intervention rather than treating psychophysiological or other biological markers as fixed, unmodifiable determinants of criminal destiny, a framework explicitly oriented toward the developmentally timed prevention applications that contemporary researchers throughout this category consistently emphasize as biosocial criminology’s most appropriate and ethically defensible practical application.
Conclusion
Autonomic nervous system and crime research has established, through an unusually large and consistently replicated cumulative literature, that low resting heart rate represents among the most consistently documented biological correlates of antisocial behavior documented within contemporary criminology, a finding complemented by convergent skin conductance research on reduced orienting responses and impaired fear conditioning. The fearlessness and stimulation-seeking theoretical frameworks proposed to explain this underarousal pattern, while theoretically distinct, together provide a coherent explanatory account connecting reduced autonomic arousal to antisocial behavior’s characteristic features, including diminished responsiveness to punishment and threat alongside heightened motivation toward exciting or risky behavior.
The longitudinal evidence demonstrating that childhood psychophysiological differences precede subsequent antisocial behavior, alongside emerging protective factor and prevention-oriented intervention research, positions this research tradition among biosocial criminology’s most methodologically mature and practically promising areas, offering meaningful early identification and intervention potential while remaining appropriately attentive to the ethical considerations that any biological risk marker research raises. Understanding autonomic nervous system findings alongside the hormonal, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological research examined throughout this category’s companion articles provides an increasingly integrated multi-method understanding of the biological correlates contributing to criminal and antisocial behavior.
Related Articles
- Hormones and Criminal Behavior
- Brain Abnormalities and Criminal Behavior
- Testosterone and Aggression
- Prenatal Factors and Crime
- Nutrition, Diet, and Criminal Behavior
References
- Beauchaine, T. (2001). Vagal tone, development, and Gray’s motivational theory: Toward an integrated model of autonomic nervous system functioning in psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 13(2), 183–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579401002012
- Birbaumer, N., Veit, R., Lotze, M., Erb, M., Hermann, C., Grodd, W., & Flor, H. (2005). Deficient fear conditioning in psychopathy: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(7), 799–805. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.7.799
- Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. G. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Fanti, K. A., Panayiotou, G., Lazarou, C., Michael, R., & Georgiou, G. (2016). The better of two evils? Evidence that children exhibiting continuous conduct problems high or low on callous-unemotional traits score on opposite directions on physiological and behavioral measures of fear. Development and Psychopathology, 28(1), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579415000371
- Frick, P. J., Ray, J. V., Thornton, L. C., & Kahn, R. E. (2014). Can callous-unemotional traits enhance the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of serious conduct problems in children and adolescents? A comprehensive review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 1–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033076
- Gao, Y., Raine, A., Venables, P. H., Dawson, M. E., & Mednick, S. A. (2010). Association of poor childhood fear conditioning and adult crime. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(1), 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09040499
- Latvala, A., Kuja-Halkola, R., Rickert, M. E., Lichtenstein, P., & Fazel, S. (2015). Cardiovascular fitness and later risk of criminal conviction: A cohort study. European Journal of Public Health, 25(1), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku144
- Lorber, M. F. (2004). Psychophysiology of aggression, psychopathy, and conduct problems: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 531–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.531
- Ortiz, J., & Raine, A. (2004). Heart rate level and antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 43(2), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200402000-00010
- Portnoy, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2015). Resting heart rate and antisocial behavior: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 22, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.02.004
- Raine, A. (2013). The anatomy of violence: The biological roots of crime. Pantheon Books.
- Raine, A., Mellingen, K., Liu, J., Venables, P., & Mednick, S. A. (2003). Effects of environmental enrichment at ages 3-5 years on schizotypal personality and antisocial behavior at ages 17 and 23 years. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(9), 1627–1635. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.160.9.1627
- Raine, A., Venables, P. H., & Mednick, S. A. (1997). Low resting heart rate at age 3 years predisposes to aggression at age 11 years: Evidence from the Mauritius Child Health Project. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(10), 1457–1464. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199710000-00029
- Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., van Roon, A. M., Verhulst, F. C., Ormel, J., & Riese, H. (2010). Mediation of sensation seeking and behavioral inhibition on the relationship between heart rate and antisocial behavior: The TRAILS study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 49(5), 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.02.005
- Wadsworth, M. E. J. (1976). Delinquency, pulse rates and early emotional deprivation. British Journal of Criminology, 16(3), 245–256.
- Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge University Press.