Sociology and Criminology Careers

Sociology and criminology careers apply social research methods and theoretical frameworks to address crime, justice, and community safety. Professionals working at the intersection of these two disciplines bring a distinctive analytical orientation to the justice system — one grounded in the study of social structures, institutional processes, inequality, and collective behavior rather than in individual pathology or technical forensic analysis. Where psychology-oriented criminologists focus on offender cognition and behavior, and forensic science specialists concentrate on physical evidence, sociology-trained criminologists examine the social conditions that produce crime, the institutional arrangements that shape justice system responses, and the community dynamics that determine whether interventions succeed or fail. This sociological lens opens career pathways in criminal justice research and policy analysis, community-based crime prevention, victim services administration, offender reentry programming, juvenile justice, reform advocacy, and academic scholarship.

Introduction

Sociology and criminology share deep intellectual roots. The founding generation of American criminologists — including Edwin Sutherland, Robert Merton, and the Chicago School researchers who established the ecological study of crime in the early twentieth century — were trained sociologists who applied sociological concepts to the study of criminal behavior and justice institutions (Akers et al., 2021). This shared lineage means that the boundary between the two fields remains more permeable than the boundaries between criminology and most other disciplines. Many of the theories that anchor contemporary criminological research — social disorganization theory, strain theory, labeling theory, social control theory, and critical criminology — originated as sociological frameworks and continue to be refined by scholars who publish in both sociological and criminological journals (Cullen et al., 2022).

The career implications of this disciplinary overlap are significant. Graduates with training in both sociology and criminology possess methodological skills — survey design, statistical analysis, qualitative interviewing, ethnographic fieldwork, program evaluation — that are directly transferable to a wide range of justice system and social service positions (Uggen & Inderbitzin, 2010). They also possess a theoretical vocabulary for understanding the structural dimensions of crime that distinguishes them from practitioners trained exclusively in criminal justice administration or law enforcement operations. This combination of methodological competence and structural analysis positions sociology-criminology graduates for careers that emphasize research, evaluation, policy development, community engagement, and systemic reform rather than the operational and enforcement functions that dominate traditional criminal justice career pathways.

This article examines the major career categories available to professionals with combined sociology and criminology expertise, the educational and credentialing requirements for each, the salary and employment outlook, and the professional development strategies that support career advancement. It is part of the broader Criminology and Criminal Justice Careers category and complements related articles on criminology and psychology careers and criminal justice research careers.

Research and Policy Analysis Careers

Criminal Justice Research Positions

Research is the career track most closely aligned with the core competencies of sociology-criminology training. Criminal justice researchers design and conduct studies of crime patterns, offender populations, policing effectiveness, sentencing outcomes, correctional programming, and community safety interventions using the quantitative and qualitative methods that form the backbone of sociological training (Maxfield & Babbie, 2021). These positions exist in federal agencies, state criminal justice planning offices, university-affiliated research centers, and private research organizations.

Federal research positions are concentrated in agencies such as the National Institute of Justice, the research arm of the U.S. Department of Justice, and the Bureau of Justice Statistics, which produces the nation’s primary criminal justice data collections including the National Crime Victimization Survey and the Census of State and Federal Adult Correctional Facilities. Research analysts at NIJ manage grant portfolios, conduct intramural studies, and synthesize research findings for policymaker audiences. BJS statisticians design and oversee data collection instruments, produce statistical reports, and maintain the public-use data sets that academic researchers rely on for secondary analysis. Entry-level research positions at these agencies typically require a master’s degree in criminology, sociology, or a related social science, with doctoral degrees preferred for senior research roles (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2023).

State-level research positions are housed in criminal justice planning agencies, sentencing commissions, and statistical analysis centers that exist in most states. These positions involve conducting state-specific crime analyses, evaluating the effectiveness of state-funded criminal justice programs, and preparing data-driven policy recommendations for legislators and executive branch officials. The Justice Research and Statistics Association coordinates the network of state statistical analysis centers and provides training and technical assistance to state-level research professionals. Compensation for state research analysts varies by jurisdiction but generally falls within the $55,000–$85,000 range for master’s-level positions, with doctoral-level senior researchers earning $80,000–$110,000 (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024).

Policy Analysis and Legislative Staff Roles

Policy analysis represents a distinct career track that draws on sociological training to translate research findings into actionable policy recommendations. Criminal justice policy analysts work for state legislatures, governors’ offices, congressional committees, federal agencies, and nongovernmental policy organizations such as the Vera Institute of Justice, the Council of State Governments Justice Center, the Sentencing Project, the Urban Institute, and the RAND Corporation (Clear et al., 2019). Their work involves reviewing existing research literatures, conducting original analyses of administrative data, modeling the projected effects of proposed legislation, and preparing briefing materials for elected officials and senior administrators.

The demand for criminal justice policy analysts has increased substantially since the mid-2010s as bipartisan interest in sentencing reform, alternatives to incarceration, and evidence-based policing has expanded the scope of policy questions that require research expertise (Petersilia, 2020). Policy analysts in this space must combine the methodological rigor of their sociological training with the ability to communicate research findings to audiences that include legislators, judges, law enforcement executives, and advocacy organizations — stakeholders who may have limited familiarity with social science methods but who make decisions that determine how research translates into practice.

Legislative staff positions focused on criminal justice policy — including committee analysts in state legislatures and staff for the U.S. Senate and House judiciary committees — represent a particularly influential career track for sociology-criminology graduates. These positions are competitive, often requiring both graduate education and prior experience in research or policy organizations, but they offer direct engagement with the policy process and opportunities to shape legislation that affects millions of people. Salaries for legislative staff in criminal justice policy range from approximately $50,000 for entry-level state positions to $90,000–$130,000 for senior congressional staff.

Community-Based Crime Prevention Careers

Community Program Directors and Coordinators

Community-based crime prevention is a career area where sociological training provides a particularly strong foundation. Unlike enforcement-oriented approaches to crime control, community-based prevention draws on social disorganization theory, collective efficacy research, and community development principles to address the social conditions associated with elevated crime rates (Sampson, 2012). Professionals in this area design, implement, and manage programs that mobilize community resources, strengthen informal social control, connect residents with services, and build the institutional capacity of neighborhoods to regulate behavior without relying exclusively on police intervention.

Employment settings for community crime prevention professionals include municipal government community safety offices, nonprofit organizations focused on violence prevention, public health departments that treat violence as a public health problem, and philanthropic foundations that fund community-level interventions. The Cure Violence model, which treats gun violence as a communicable disease and employs trained community members as violence interrupters, has been adopted in more than 80 cities and represents a major employment source for professionals with sociological and criminological training (Butts et al., 2015). Community-based crime prevention directors earn salaries ranging from approximately $55,000 at small nonprofit organizations to $95,000 or more at major urban violence prevention initiatives, with social and community service managers across all sectors earning a median of $78,240 in May 2024 (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024).

Violence Prevention and Public Health Approaches

The reframing of violence as a public health issue has created a distinct career pathway for sociology-criminology professionals within public health agencies and hospitals. Cities including Chicago, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Oakland, and Richmond have established offices of violence prevention that employ epidemiological methods to identify violence hotspots, deploy outreach workers to interrupt retaliatory cycles, and connect individuals at high risk of violence involvement with employment, housing, and behavioral health services (Webster et al., 2018). These offices are typically staffed by professionals who combine public health and social science training, and they represent one of the fastest-growing employment sectors for sociology-criminology graduates.

Hospital-based violence intervention programs represent a related career track. Programs such as the National Network of Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Programs employ intervention specialists who engage with violently injured patients in hospital emergency departments, providing case management services during the recovery period to reduce the likelihood of reinjury and retaliatory violence (Purtle et al., 2013). These positions require knowledge of both the sociological research on violence trajectories and the practical skills of case management, crisis intervention, and community resource navigation. The growth of these programs — from fewer than a dozen in 2010 to more than 40 in 2024 — has created substantial new employment opportunities, with intervention specialists earning $40,000–$65,000 and program directors earning $70,000–$100,000 depending on the size and funding of the program.

Victim Services and Advocacy Careers

Victim Advocacy and Services Administration

Victim services is a career area where sociological perspectives on inequality, power, and institutional access are particularly relevant. Victim advocates work within prosecutor’s offices, law enforcement agencies, courts, hospitals, and community-based organizations to ensure that crime victims receive information about their legal rights, assistance navigating the criminal justice process, referrals to counseling and material support services, and safety planning for victims of ongoing interpersonal violence (Daigle, 2018). The role requires both interpersonal skill in working with individuals experiencing trauma and structural awareness of the systemic barriers — economic, linguistic, cultural, and institutional — that prevent many victims from accessing available services.

The federal Victims of Crime Act, administered through the Office for Victims of Crime at the U.S. Department of Justice, provides the primary funding stream for state and local victim services programs and creates the employment base for much of the victim services workforce. VOCA-funded positions include victim witness coordinators in prosecutor’s offices, domestic violence and sexual assault counselors in community-based agencies, and victim services directors who manage the administrative and grant compliance dimensions of VOCA-funded programs. Salaries in victim services are generally lower than in other criminal justice career areas, with victim advocates earning median salaries of approximately $45,000–$55,000, though supervisory and director-level positions in large programs reach $70,000–$85,000 (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024).

Restorative Justice Facilitation

Restorative justice facilitation has emerged as a specialized career niche within the broader victim services and community justice landscape. Restorative justice programs — which bring together offenders, victims, and community members to address the harm caused by criminal behavior through dialogue, accountability, and repair — are grounded in sociological theories of community, social bonds, and reintegrative shaming (Braithwaite, 1989). Facilitators must understand both the theoretical foundations of restorative processes and the practical dynamics of managing emotionally charged encounters between people with fundamentally different relationships to a criminal event.

Employment in restorative justice has expanded as juvenile courts, school districts, prosecutor’s offices, and correctional systems have adopted restorative practices as alternatives to or supplements for conventional processing. The state of Vermont operates a statewide community justice center system that employs restorative justice coordinators in every county. Minnesota, Colorado, and several other states fund restorative justice programs through their departments of corrections or juvenile justice agencies. Nonprofit organizations including the National Association for Community and Restorative Justice provide training, certification, and networking opportunities for practitioners. Career prospects in restorative justice are growing, though the field remains relatively small compared to conventional victim services, and many positions are part-time or grant-funded (Bazemore & Schiff, 2013).

Offender Reentry and Reintegration Careers

Reentry Program Management

Offender reentry — the process by which individuals released from incarceration transition back into community life — has become one of the most active employment sectors at the sociology-criminology intersection. Approximately 600,000 people are released from state and federal prisons annually in the United States, and research consistently demonstrates that the period immediately following release carries the highest risk for recidivism, homelessness, overdose death, and other adverse outcomes (Petersilia, 2003; Travis, 2005). Reentry program managers design and oversee the service delivery systems intended to reduce these risks, coordinating housing assistance, employment training, substance abuse treatment, family reunification services, and supervision compliance support.

The Second Chance Act, first authorized in 2008 and reauthorized multiple times since, provides federal grant funding for state and local reentry programs and has substantially expanded the reentry workforce (James, 2020). Reentry positions exist in state departments of corrections, county probation departments, federal probation offices, nonprofit reentry service providers, and workforce development agencies. The sociological dimension of reentry work is significant: effective reentry programming requires an understanding of the structural barriers — labor market discrimination against people with criminal records, housing restrictions, public benefit exclusions, and civic disenfranchisement — that impede successful reintegration regardless of individual motivation (Pager, 2007). Sociology-criminology graduates bring precisely this structural awareness to reentry practice.

Diversion and Alternative Sentencing Programs

Diversion programs that route individuals away from conventional criminal justice processing and into community-based treatment, supervision, or service programs represent another growing employment area. Drug courts, mental health courts, veterans’ treatment courts, and community courts all employ program coordinators, case managers, and evaluators who manage participant compliance, connect individuals with services, and track program outcomes (Marlowe et al., 2016). These specialty court programs have expanded rapidly since the 1990s, with more than 4,000 drug courts and several hundred mental health courts now operating across the United States.

Program evaluation is a particularly important role within diversion and alternative sentencing programs. Funders, legislators, and judicial administrators increasingly require evidence that diversion programs produce measurable reductions in recidivism, substance use, and criminal justice system costs. Evaluators with sociology-criminology training design outcome studies, analyze administrative data, and report findings that determine whether programs continue to receive funding. This evaluation function is critical to the sustainability of diversion programming and represents a high-demand career niche for graduates with strong quantitative methods training (Rossi et al., 2019).

Juvenile Justice Careers

Youth Services and Juvenile Probation

Juvenile justice has long been a practice area where sociological perspectives are especially influential. The juvenile justice system’s historical emphasis on rehabilitation over punishment, its attention to family and community context, and its recognition that adolescent development constrains culpability all reflect sociological and developmental principles (Feld, 2017). Professionals working in juvenile justice settings — as probation officers, case managers, residential counselors, and program coordinators — apply these principles in daily practice, assessing the social circumstances of youth in the system and connecting them with educational, vocational, family, and behavioral health services designed to redirect their developmental trajectories.

Juvenile probation officers represent the largest single occupational group within juvenile justice. They conduct predisposition investigations that assess the social and family environments of adjudicated youth, develop supervision plans, monitor compliance with court orders, and coordinate service delivery across multiple agencies. The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, a component of the U.S. Department of Justice, supports state and local juvenile justice systems through formula grants, discretionary grants, and technical assistance programs that sustain much of the juvenile justice workforce. Probation officers and correctional treatment specialists — the BLS category that includes juvenile probation officers — earned a median annual wage of $64,520 in May 2024, with projected employment growth of 3 percent between 2024 and 2034 (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024).

Youth Violence Prevention and Intervention

Youth violence prevention is a specialized career area that draws heavily on sociological research regarding peer influence, neighborhood effects, school climate, and the social ecology of adolescent development. Prevention specialists design and deliver programs that target the social processes associated with youth violence onset — gang involvement, weapon carrying, conflict escalation, and retaliatory cycles — using evidence-based approaches that have been evaluated through rigorous research designs (Tolan et al., 2017). Employment settings include school districts, youth-serving nonprofit organizations, municipal parks and recreation departments, and public health agencies.

The Blueprints for Healthy Youth Development registry, maintained by the University of Colorado Boulder, catalogs evidence-based programs for youth violence prevention and provides a framework for practitioners to select interventions with demonstrated effectiveness. Programs listed on the registry — including Multisystemic Therapy, Functional Family Therapy, and the Nurse-Family Partnership — employ staff with training in sociology, criminology, social work, and psychology. Career advancement in youth violence prevention typically involves moving from direct service delivery into program management, training, and evaluation roles, with senior prevention directors at major urban initiatives earning $80,000–$110,000 annually.

Academic and Teaching Careers

University Faculty Positions

Academic careers in criminology and sociology represent the traditional pinnacle of scholarly career pathways at the intersection of these disciplines. Tenure-track faculty positions at research universities involve a combination of original research, graduate and undergraduate teaching, and service to the profession and institution. The American Society of Criminology and the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences serve as the primary professional associations for criminology faculty, hosting annual conferences, publishing flagship journals, and maintaining employment exchanges that connect job seekers with hiring departments (American Society of Criminology, 2023).

The academic job market in criminology has been moderately competitive over the past decade. The expansion of criminal justice and criminology undergraduate programs — driven by strong student demand — has created teaching positions at regional universities and community colleges, though tenure-track research positions at doctoral-granting institutions remain limited in number relative to the supply of new doctoral graduates. Postsecondary teachers in the criminal justice and law enforcement instructional area earned a median annual wage of $84,380 in May 2024, with considerable variation by institution type, geographic location, and rank (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024). Faculty at research-intensive institutions who maintain active research programs, secure external grant funding, and publish in high-impact journals earn substantially above this median.

Research Institute and Think Tank Positions

Research positions outside the traditional academic tenure track represent an important alternative for sociology-criminology graduates who prefer applied research to classroom teaching. Policy research organizations including the Urban Institute, the RAND Corporation, MDRC, Abt Associates, and the Vera Institute of Justice employ researchers who design and conduct studies of criminal justice programs and policies under contract with federal and state agencies (Clear et al., 2019). These positions offer research-focused career pathways without the teaching, committee service, and tenure requirements of academic appointments, though they typically involve less autonomy in research topic selection and greater responsiveness to funder priorities.

Think tank positions in criminal justice research often provide salaries competitive with or exceeding academic compensation, particularly at the senior researcher and center director levels. Entry-level research associate positions at major policy organizations typically start in the $55,000–$70,000 range for master’s-level hires, with doctoral-level researchers earning $80,000–$120,000 and senior fellows or center directors earning $130,000–$180,000 depending on the organization’s size and location. These positions also offer opportunities for public engagement — congressional testimony, media commentary, policy briefings — that extend the reach of research findings beyond academic audiences.

Education and Professional Development

Undergraduate and Graduate Preparation

Educational preparation for sociology-criminology careers begins at the undergraduate level with a major in sociology, criminology, criminal justice, or a closely related field. Students who plan to pursue research or policy careers should prioritize coursework in research methods, statistics, and social theory, as these competencies form the methodological foundation for advanced work in either discipline (Uggen & Inderbitzin, 2010). Undergraduate internships in research offices, policy organizations, victim services agencies, or community-based crime prevention programs provide practical experience that strengthens graduate school applications and early-career employment prospects.

Graduate education is essential for most research, policy, and leadership positions at the sociology-criminology intersection. Master’s degrees in criminology, criminal justice, sociology, or public policy provide the training in advanced methods, theory, and substantive knowledge areas required for mid-career positions. Doctoral programs are required for academic careers and strongly preferred for senior research and policy positions. Leading doctoral programs in criminology and criminal justice — at institutions including the University of Cincinnati, the University of Maryland, the University at Albany, Florida State University, Penn State University, and Arizona State University — produce graduates who are competitive for both academic and policy research positions (American Society of Criminology, 2023).

Methods Training and Specialization

Strong methods training distinguishes competitive sociology-criminology graduates from their peers. Employers in research, evaluation, and policy analysis consistently identify quantitative methods proficiency — including regression analysis, multilevel modeling, propensity score matching, and geographic information systems — as the single most important skill set for entry-level hires (Maxfield & Babbie, 2021). Qualitative methods training, including interviewing, ethnographic fieldwork, focus group facilitation, and content analysis, is equally valued in community-based practice, victim services, and program development roles where understanding the lived experiences of justice-involved populations is essential to effective program design.

Specialization in a substantive area — policing, corrections, juvenile justice, sentencing, drugs and crime, violence, or community safety — further strengthens career prospects by allowing graduates to develop expertise that differentiates them from generalists. Many graduate programs encourage or require students to develop a specialization area through directed coursework, qualifying examinations, and dissertation research focused on a specific domain. Professional certifications, while less central to sociology-criminology careers than to forensic or clinical careers, provide additional credentialing in areas such as program evaluation (American Evaluation Association), victim advocacy (National Organization for Victim Assistance), and crime analysis (International Association of Crime Analysts).

Salary Data and Employment Outlook

Compensation Across Career Tracks

Salary data for sociology-criminology careers spans several Bureau of Labor Statistics occupational categories. Social science research assistants — the entry-level category for many research positions — earned a median annual wage of $58,420 in May 2024 (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024). Sociologists earned a median of $101,280, though this category includes only those employed in positions specifically classified as sociologist, which represents a small fraction of the sociology-trained workforce. Social and community service managers, the category most relevant to community crime prevention directors and reentry program managers, earned a median of $78,240 with projected growth of 9 percent between 2024 and 2034.

The compensation picture improves considerably at the graduate and mid-career levels. Doctoral-level researchers at policy organizations and federal agencies earn $80,000–$130,000 depending on experience and location. Senior policy analysts in state government and nonprofit organizations earn $75,000–$110,000. Academic faculty at research universities earn salaries that vary widely by rank and institution, with assistant professors in criminology programs typically starting between $70,000 and $90,000, associate professors earning $80,000–$110,000, and full professors earning $100,000–$160,000 at research-intensive institutions (American Society of Criminology, 2023). Federal employees in research and policy roles benefit from General Schedule pay scales that include locality adjustments, with GS-12 to GS-14 positions — the typical range for experienced research analysts — paying $80,000–$130,000 in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area.

Employment Trends and Growth Areas

The employment outlook for sociology-criminology careers is shaped by several converging trends. The expansion of evidence-based practice in criminal justice — driven by legislative mandates, funder requirements, and professional standards — has increased demand for researchers and evaluators who can design rigorous studies and interpret their findings (Petersilia, 2020). The growth of community-based violence prevention, funded through public health initiatives and municipal safety budgets, has created new positions for professionals who understand the social ecology of violence. The continued expansion of reentry programming, supported by federal Second Chance Act funding and state-level criminal justice reform legislation, sustains demand for reentry specialists and program managers (James, 2020).

The strongest growth areas for sociology-criminology professionals include violence prevention and intervention (particularly hospital-based and community-based programs), criminal justice data analytics, policy research and evaluation, and specialty court programming. Traditional probation and correctional positions are growing more slowly, with some correctional officer categories projected to decline. Academic positions remain competitive but are sustained by strong undergraduate enrollment in criminology and criminal justice programs. The overall trajectory favors graduates who combine sociological theoretical knowledge with strong methodological skills and practical experience in justice system or community settings, positioning them to contribute to the ongoing transformation of criminal justice practice from intuition-driven to evidence-informed approaches.

Conclusion

Careers at the intersection of sociology and criminology offer a distinctive professional identity within the broader criminal justice landscape. Professionals trained in both disciplines bring structural awareness, methodological rigor, and theoretical depth to roles that span research, policy analysis, community-based prevention, victim services, offender reentry, juvenile justice, and academic scholarship. The employment outlook across these career tracks is generally positive, with particularly strong growth in community violence prevention, policy research, and program evaluation. Compensation varies significantly by sector and education level, but master’s and doctoral-level professionals in this space typically earn salaries competitive with other social science career pathways.

The educational pathway to these careers emphasizes graduate training in research methods and sociological theory, supplemented by substantive specialization and practical experience in justice system or community settings. As the criminal justice system increasingly recognizes that effective crime control depends not only on enforcement and adjudication but also on understanding and addressing the social conditions that produce criminal behavior, the demand for professionals who can bridge sociological analysis and criminal justice practice will continue to strengthen. Students considering this interdisciplinary career path should invest in rigorous methods training, seek internships and research assistantships that provide applied experience, and develop the capacity to communicate social science findings to practitioner and policymaker audiences who will ultimately determine whether research translates into meaningful change.

References

Akers, R. L., Sellers, C. S., & Jennings, W. G. (2021). Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation, and application (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
American Society of Criminology. (2023). Guide to graduate programs in criminology and criminal justice. ASC.
Bazemore, G., & Schiff, M. (2013). Restorative community justice: Repairing harm and transforming communities. Routledge.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. Cambridge University Press.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2023). About BJS. U.S. Department of Justice.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024). Occupational outlook handbook. U.S. Department of Labor.
Butts, J. A., Roman, C. G., Bostwick, L., & Porter, J. R. (2015). Cure Violence: A public health model to reduce gun violence. Annual Review of Public Health, 36, 39–53.
Clear, T. R., Reisig, M. D., & Cole, G. F. (2019). American corrections (12th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Cullen, F. T., Agnew, R., & Wilcox, P. (2022). Criminological theory: Past to present (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Daigle, L. E. (2018). Victimology: The essentials (2nd ed.). Sage.
Feld, B. C. (2017). The evolution of the juvenile court: Race, politics, and the criminalizing of juvenile justice. New York University Press.
James, N. (2020). The Second Chance Act: Overview and reauthorization issues (CRS Report R45465). Congressional Research Service.
Marlowe, D. B., Hardin, C. D., & Fox, C. L. (2016). Painting the current picture: A national report on drug courts and other problem-solving courts in the United States. National Drug Court Institute.
Maxfield, M. G., & Babbie, E. R. (2021). Research methods for criminal justice and criminology (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Pager, D. (2007). Marked: Race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. University of Chicago Press.
Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford University Press.
Petersilia, J. (2020). The evolution of evidence-based corrections. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 32(4), 231–238.
Purtle, J., Rich, L. J., Bloom, S. L., Rich, J. A., & Yonas, M. A. (2013). Cost-benefit analysis simulation of a hospital-based violence intervention program. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45(2), 175–182.
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Henry, G. T. (2019). Evaluation: A systematic approach (8th ed.). Sage.
Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. University of Chicago Press.
Tolan, P., Henry, D., Schoeny, M., Lovegrove, P., & Nichols, E. (2017). Mentoring programs to affect delinquency and associated outcomes of youth at risk: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(2), 179–206.
Travis, J. (2005). But they all come back: Facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. Urban Institute Press.
Uggen, C., & Inderbitzin, M. (2010). Public criminologies. Criminology and Public Policy, 9(4), 725–749.
Webster, D. W., Whitehill, J. M., Vernick, J. S., & Curriero, F. C. (2018). Effects of Baltimore’s Safe Streets program on gun violence. American Journal of Public Health, 103(1), 2221–2227.

Related Articles