Criminal Justice Accredited Online Schools

Criminal justice accredited online schools provide the educational quality assurance that protects students’ financial investments, ensures credential recognition by employers and graduate programs, and maintains the professional standards that communities expect from the criminal justice workforce. As a decision-guiding resource within Criminal Justice Education, identifying accredited online schools — and understanding how to choose among them based on individual circumstances, career goals, and educational needs — requires navigating a marketplace in which legitimate institutions compete with providers whose credentials may not carry the recognition that students assume they will. Within the broader field of Criminology, the distinction between accredited and non-accredited online schools determines whether the expansion of online criminal justice education produces professionals with verified competencies or merely consumers who have purchased credentials of uncertain value.

Introduction

The term “accredited” carries more weight in criminal justice education than in many other fields because of the direct connection between educational credentials and the exercise of public authority. Police officers, correctional officers, probation agents, forensic analysts, and intelligence professionals exercise powers — arrest, detention, search, surveillance, use of force — that affect the liberty, safety, and lives of the people they serve. The education that prepares these professionals should meet standards sufficient to ensure that they possess the knowledge, analytical skills, and ethical judgment that responsible exercise of these powers demands (Sherman, 1998). Accreditation provides the institutional mechanism through which these standards are established and verified, making the accreditation status of an online school not merely an administrative detail but a substantive indicator of whether the education it provides is adequate to its purpose.

The practical consequences of attending an unaccredited or improperly accredited online school are severe and often irreversible. Credits earned at unaccredited institutions typically do not transfer to accredited schools, meaning that students who begin their education at an unaccredited institution and later wish to complete a degree at an accredited one may need to start over from scratch (Southerland, 2002). Degrees from unaccredited institutions may not be recognized by federal, state, or local law enforcement agencies for hiring or promotion purposes, potentially disqualifying graduates from the careers they sought the education to pursue (Hilal & Densley, 2013). Federal financial aid — including Pell Grants, federal student loans, and GI Bill benefits — is available only at institutions accredited by agencies recognized by the U.S. Department of Education, meaning that students at unaccredited schools must finance their education entirely from personal resources (Frost & Clear, 2012). These consequences make accreditation verification not merely advisable but essential — a non-negotiable first step in the enrollment decision process.

This article guides prospective students through the process of choosing among accredited online criminal justice schools, providing decision frameworks tailored to different student populations, comparative analysis of accredited options across institutional categories, guidance on avoiding common pitfalls, and resources for verifying accreditation independently.

What Accredited Online Schools Provide

Academic Standards and Institutional Infrastructure

Accredited online criminal justice schools maintain the institutional infrastructure that legitimate higher education requires — qualified faculty, adequate library resources, student support services, assessment mechanisms, and governance structures accountable to external review. These elements, while invisible in marketing materials, determine the actual educational substance that students receive. The accreditation review process evaluates each of these elements through self-study reports, peer review visits, and periodic reaffirmation cycles that typically occur every ten years, with interim monitoring that addresses any concerns identified during the review process (Morn, 1995).

Faculty qualifications at accredited schools must meet standards that the accrediting agency establishes and verifies. Regional accreditors typically require that faculty teaching college-level courses hold degrees at least one level above the courses they teach — master’s degrees for undergraduate instruction, doctoral degrees for graduate instruction — and that institutions maintain a sufficient proportion of full-time faculty to ensure curricular coherence, student mentoring, and institutional continuity (Cohn & Farrington, 2014). While specific ratios vary across accreditors and institutional types, the requirement that accredited schools demonstrate adequate faculty qualifications provides a quality floor that unaccredited institutions are not obligated to meet. Programs at accredited research universities — Arizona State University, Penn State, University of Cincinnati, George Mason University — maintain faculty who hold doctoral degrees, publish in peer-reviewed journals, and conduct funded research, bringing current scholarly knowledge directly into online instruction (Steiner, Wright, & Toto, 2020).

Library resources at accredited institutions must meet standards sufficient to support the educational programs offered. For criminal justice students, this means access to digital databases including Criminal Justice Abstracts, JSTOR, PsycINFO, and the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) — resources essential for completing research papers, literature reviews, and evidence-based assignments that rigorous criminal justice coursework requires (Piquero & Weisburd, 2010). Access to statistical software (R, SPSS, Stata) and data archives such as the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) further supports the analytical skill development that distinguishes education from mere credentialing.

Student support services at accredited schools include academic advising, tutoring, writing center access, disability accommodations, career counseling, and technical support — services that accrediting agencies evaluate during their review processes and that accredited institutions are obligated to provide. Online students at accredited schools can access these services remotely through video consultations, online chat, email, and phone — an infrastructure that unaccredited institutions have no obligation to maintain and that many do not provide (Bachman & Schutt, 2020).

Curriculum Quality and Assessment Rigor

Accredited online criminal justice schools must demonstrate that their curricula achieve defined learning outcomes through assessment processes that accrediting agencies evaluate. This requirement means that accredited programs cannot merely offer courses — they must demonstrate that students who complete those courses have actually learned what the courses are designed to teach. The assessment infrastructure includes course-level assessment (examinations, papers, projects), program-level assessment (capstone evaluations, qualifying examinations, portfolio reviews), and institutional assessment (graduation rates, employment outcomes, alumni surveys) that collectively provide evidence of educational effectiveness (Southerland, 2002).

The curricular standards at accredited schools for criminal justice typically include required coursework in criminological theory, criminal justice systems (policing, courts, corrections), research methods, and statistics — the core analytical competencies that the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences identifies as essential for criminal justice education (Cullen, Agnew, & Wilcox, 2014). Programs that meet these standards produce graduates who can think critically about crime and justice — who can evaluate evidence, apply theoretical frameworks, design research, and analyze data — rather than graduates who merely describe institutional procedures without understanding the scholarly foundations on which evidence-based practice rests (Sherman, 1998).

The assessment expectations at accredited schools typically include written analytical work — research papers, case analyses, policy briefs, literature reviews — that develops the communication skills criminal justice careers demand. Programs whose assessment relies exclusively on multiple-choice examinations fail to develop these writing skills, and accreditation reviewers increasingly expect programs to demonstrate that their assessment methods align with their stated learning outcomes. This alignment requirement, enforced through accreditation review, provides a quality assurance mechanism that students at unaccredited institutions cannot rely upon (Robinson & Rudes, 2012).

Choosing Among Accredited Schools: A Decision Framework

For Working Law Enforcement Professionals

Law enforcement officers pursuing online criminal justice degrees while working full-time have specific needs that shape which accredited schools will serve them best. Scheduling flexibility is paramount: officers on rotating shifts, mandatory overtime, and court appearance obligations need programs that offer fully asynchronous delivery or multiple synchronous session times rather than fixed weekly meeting schedules (Paoline & Terrill, 2007). Many agencies offer tuition reimbursement or educational incentive pay for officers with bachelor’s or master’s degrees, making the financial return on educational investment particularly strong for this population — but reimbursement policies may restrict eligible institutions to those meeting specific accreditation or quality criteria, requiring officers to verify their agency’s policies before enrolling (Hilal & Densley, 2013).

Accredited schools that are particularly well-suited for law enforcement professionals include Arizona State University Online (fully asynchronous delivery with strong policing faculty whose research addresses patrol strategy, use of force, procedural justice, and evidence-based policing — accredited by the Higher Learning Commission), Penn State World Campus (established online infrastructure since 1998 with Penn State’s research faculty and brand recognition valued by federal agencies — accredited by Middle States Commission on Higher Education), George Mason University Online (evidence-based policing emphasis through the Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy, which has produced some of the most influential policing research of the past two decades — accredited by Southern Association of Colleges and Schools), and Michigan State University Online (policing research strengths with one of the oldest CJ programs nationally and strong connections to Michigan law enforcement agencies — accredited by the Higher Learning Commission) (Weisburd & Neyroud, 2011). Officers who hold associate degrees from community colleges should investigate articulation agreements that may allow seamless transfer of existing credits, reducing time-to-degree and cost. Officers interested in federal law enforcement careers should prioritize schools whose degrees meet the specific educational requirements of target agencies — the FBI, DEA, ATF, and Secret Service all require bachelor’s degrees from accredited institutions (Carter, 2009).

For Correctional and Community Supervision Professionals

Correctional officers, probation agents, and parole officers pursuing online criminal justice degrees face scheduling challenges similar to those of law enforcement officers — shift work, institutional demands, and geographic isolation from university campuses — but have distinctive educational needs shaped by the evidence-based practice revolution that has transformed correctional programming over the past two decades. Programs that provide substantial coverage of the Risk-Needs-Responsivity framework (Andrews & Bonta, 2010), cognitive-behavioral intervention models, motivational interviewing techniques, and program evaluation methods serve correctional professionals more effectively than generic criminal justice programs that treat corrections as one topic among many (Latessa & Lovins, 2010).

The University of Cincinnati Online stands apart as the strongest accredited online option for correctional professionals, offering an MS in Criminal Justice that integrates the program’s nationally recognized expertise in evidence-based corrections through its Corrections Institute — the same institute that provides training and technical assistance to state corrections departments nationwide (accredited by the Higher Learning Commission). Sam Houston State University Online offers graduate education through one of the nation’s largest CJ programs, located adjacent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice headquarters in Huntsville — a proximity that creates unique practicum and research opportunities (accredited by Southern Association of Colleges and Schools). University of Nebraska at Omaha Online offers a research-focused online MS with faculty strengths relevant to community supervision and corrections policy (accredited by the Higher Learning Commission). Correctional agencies that provide tuition reimbursement may restrict eligible institutions to those meeting specific accreditation standards, making accreditation verification essential before enrollment.

For Military Service Members and Veterans

Military-connected students — active-duty service members, reservists, National Guard members, and veterans — have access to educational benefits that make online criminal justice education financially accessible but that carry specific institutional requirements and eligibility conditions. The Post-9/11 GI Bill covers tuition, a monthly housing allowance (for students enrolled more than half-time), and a books and supplies stipend, with the Yellow Ribbon Program covering additional costs at participating institutions. The Department of Defense Tuition Assistance (TA) program provides up to $250 per credit hour for active-duty members at institutions that have signed a DoD Memorandum of Understanding. All of these benefits require enrollment at institutions with accreditation recognized by the Department of Education (Tewksbury & Mustaine, 2011).

Accredited schools with strong military student support include American Military University (purpose-built for military populations with deployment-friendly scheduling, military credit transfer policies, and course content reflecting military experiences — accredited by the Higher Learning Commission), University of Maryland Global Campus (decades of military education experience with physical locations on military installations worldwide and fully online programs accessible to deployed service members — accredited by Middle States Commission on Higher Education), Excelsior University (extensive prior learning assessment policies that award credit for military training evaluated by the American Council on Education — accredited by Middle States Commission on Higher Education), Penn State World Campus (Yellow Ribbon Program participant with strong military community support and Penn State’s institutional reputation — accredited by Middle States Commission on Higher Education), and Arizona State University Online (Pat Tillman Veterans Center providing veteran-specific academic support, career services, and community — accredited by the Higher Learning Commission). Military students should verify that their chosen institution participates in the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (NC-SARA) to avoid complications from state authorization requirements that might affect enrollment eligibility during permanent change-of-station moves. The Veterans Benefits Administration provides resources for comparing GI Bill benefits across institutions, and the GI Bill Comparison Tool helps military students estimate their benefits at specific schools.

The Department of Defense maintains a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) program that requires institutions receiving DoD Tuition Assistance funds to meet specific educational quality standards, provide accurate information to service members, and maintain complaint resolution procedures. Institutions that have signed the DoD MOU have agreed to these standards, providing an additional layer of quality assurance beyond accreditation for military students. Students using Tuition Assistance should verify their institution’s MOU status through the DoD MOU website before enrolling to ensure TA eligibility (Carter, 2009).

For Career Changers and Degree Completers

Students entering criminal justice from other fields and adults returning to complete degrees they began previously have distinctive needs that shape their choice among accredited online schools. Career changers — professionals from business, education, social work, or military backgrounds who seek to enter the criminal justice field — benefit from programs with generous transfer credit policies that recognize prior coursework from accredited institutions, reducing the duplication of general education and foundational courses already completed (Clear, 2001). Degree completers — adults who attended college previously but did not finish their degrees — benefit from programs that accept the maximum number of transfer credits and provide clear degree completion pathways with minimal redundancy.

Accredited schools that serve these populations particularly well include Southern New Hampshire University (accepts up to 90 transfer credits, providing accelerated completion for students with substantial prior coursework), Colorado State University Global (designed specifically for adult learners with prior college experience, offering accelerated formats and guaranteed tuition rates), Purdue University Global (ExcelTrack competency-based options for experienced adults), and University of Massachusetts Lowell (affordable public rates with flexible transfer policies). Students with professional certifications, military training, or workplace learning evaluated by the American Council on Education (ACE) should investigate whether their target institutions accept ACE credit recommendations, as this can significantly reduce time-to-degree (Steiner, Wright, & Toto, 2020). Students approaching degree completion should request a formal transfer credit evaluation from their target institution before enrolling, ensuring that they understand exactly how many credits will transfer and how many remain to be completed.

For Students Planning Graduate Study

Students whose ultimate goal is graduate education — master’s programs, doctoral programs, law school, or professional programs in public policy or social work — should prioritize accredited online schools that develop the analytical competencies graduate admissions committees evaluate: theoretical reasoning, methodological literacy, statistical analysis, and analytical writing (Mustaine & Tewksbury, 2009). The prestige and academic rigor of the undergraduate institution carries weight in graduate admissions, and online programs affiliated with well-known research universities provide stronger credentials for graduate school applications than programs at institutions whose reputations admissions committees may not recognize.

Accredited schools best suited for graduate school preparation include Arizona State University, Penn State, George Mason University, University of Central Florida, and Florida International University — all regionally accredited research universities whose online programs are taught by faculty with active research programs who can provide the mentoring, research opportunities, and recommendation letters that competitive graduate applications require (Cohn & Farrington, 2014). Students at these institutions should actively seek research involvement opportunities — faculty-mentored projects, independent study courses, honors theses — that produce the writing samples and research experience that doctoral programs evaluate alongside transcripts and standardized test scores.

Accredited Schools by Degree Level

Bachelor’s Degree Programs at Accredited Schools

Accredited online bachelor’s degree programs in criminal justice serve the largest student population in the online education market, providing the foundational credential that most criminal justice careers require for entry or advancement. The strongest accredited bachelor’s programs combine a rigorous core curriculum in theory, methods, and statistics with broad elective offerings, structured internship programs, and career services that translate academic preparation into professional opportunity (Cullen, Agnew, & Wilcox, 2014).

Students choosing among accredited bachelor’s programs should prioritize institutions whose faculty hold doctoral degrees and maintain active research programs — a characteristic that distinguishes programs at research universities (Arizona State University Online, Penn State World Campus, George Mason University Online, University of Central Florida Online, Washington State University Global, Florida International University Online, University of Massachusetts Lowell Online) from programs at primarily online institutions where instruction may rely more heavily on adjunct faculty (Southern New Hampshire University, Purdue University Global, Liberty University, Colorado State University Global) (Frost & Clear, 2012). Both categories maintain regional accreditation and produce degrees that employers recognize, but the depth of instruction, the quality of faculty interaction, and the analytical skills developed may differ in ways that affect graduates’ preparedness for demanding career roles and graduate study.

For students seeking the most affordable accredited pathway, community colleges offering online criminal justice courses — Northern Virginia Community College, Miami Dade College, Rio Salado College — provide regionally accredited coursework at tuition rates typically under $200 per credit hour that can transfer to four-year institutions through articulation agreements. The two-plus-two pathway — completing an associate degree at a community college and then transferring to a university for the bachelor’s — can reduce total educational cost by 40 to 50 percent compared to completing all four years at a university, making this pathway particularly valuable for cost-conscious students (Gabbidon, Penn, & Richards, 2003).

Master’s Degree Programs at Accredited Schools

Accredited online master’s degree programs serve working professionals seeking career advancement, aspiring researchers preparing for doctoral study, and career changers entering criminal justice from other fields. The master’s degree is the credential that most distinguishes candidates for supervisory, analytical, and policy positions in criminal justice agencies — positions that require the advanced analytical skills, research literacy, and specialized knowledge that bachelor’s programs typically do not develop to the same depth (Andrews & Bonta, 2010).

The strongest accredited online master’s programs are operated by universities whose residential programs have established research reputations: University of Cincinnati Online (evidence-based corrections and RNR framework — accredited by HLC), Michigan State University Online (policing and cybercrime — accredited by HLC), Arizona State University Online (policing, sentencing, and policy — accredited by HLC), Boston University Online (interdisciplinary criminal justice — accredited by NECHE), Sam Houston State University Online (corrections and Texas CJ — accredited by SACSCOC), and University of Nebraska at Omaha Online (research-focused distance education — accredited by HLC) (Latessa & Lovins, 2010; Cohn & Farrington, 2014).

Students choosing among accredited master’s programs should evaluate the thesis versus non-thesis options available, as this choice carries significant implications for doctoral study preparation. Programs that offer a thesis option — requiring original research under faculty mentorship — develop research competencies that doctoral admissions committees evaluate alongside transcripts and test scores. Programs that offer only non-thesis options (capstone projects, qualifying examinations, summative portfolios) may satisfy the credential requirement for career advancement but provide less research preparation for students planning doctoral study (Mustaine & Tewksbury, 2009).

Avoiding Common Pitfalls

Accreditation Red Flags and Diploma Mills

The online education market includes institutions that exploit student demand for flexible credentials by offering degrees of no legitimate value — commonly called “diploma mills.” These operations may claim accreditation from agencies that are not recognized by the Department of Education or CHEA, may promise degrees based on minimal coursework or “life experience” assessment, may charge fees dramatically below (or above) market rates, and may lack the faculty, library resources, student services, and assessment mechanisms that genuine educational institutions maintain (Robinson & Rudes, 2012). Specific red flags include:

Accreditation claims from agencies not listed in the Department of Education’s database or the CHEA directory should be treated as non-credible. Some diploma mills create fake accrediting agencies with official-sounding names that mimic legitimate accreditors. Degrees that can be completed in weeks or months rather than the multi-year timeframes that legitimate programs require suggest that the institution is selling credentials rather than delivering education. Institutions that charge a flat fee for a complete degree rather than per-credit tuition — particularly fees that seem remarkably low — may be providing a financial transaction rather than an educational experience. Websites that emphasize testimonials and career promises over curriculum descriptions, faculty qualifications, and academic policies may be marketing vehicles rather than educational institution portals (Frost & Clear, 2012).

Students who suspect they have encountered a diploma mill should verify the institution’s accreditation through official Department of Education and CHEA directories, search for the institution’s name in conjunction with terms like “review,” “complaint,” or “scam” to identify reported problems, check whether the institution is authorized to operate in its home state, and consult the Federal Trade Commission‘s resources on educational fraud. The investment of thirty minutes in verification can prevent years of wasted effort and thousands of dollars of wasted tuition — a return on time that few other activities in the enrollment process can match (Morn, 1995).

The Cost of Getting It Wrong

The consequences of attending an improperly accredited online school are not hypothetical — they are documented in the experiences of students who have discovered too late that their degrees, credits, and educational investments were not what they appeared to be. Students who complete associate degrees at nationally accredited institutions and attempt to transfer to regionally accredited universities frequently discover that few or none of their credits are accepted, requiring them to restart their education at the introductory level despite years of prior coursework. Military veterans who use GI Bill benefits at institutions that subsequently lose accreditation may find that their remaining benefits are insufficient to complete a degree elsewhere, as the benefits clock continues to run regardless of institutional accreditation changes. Working professionals who earn degrees from unaccredited institutions and present them for promotion consideration may find that their agencies do not recognize the credential, leaving them with student debt but without the career advancement the degree was supposed to produce (Southerland, 2002; Tewksbury & Mustaine, 2011).

These consequences are avoidable through the verification procedures described in this article — checking accreditation through official databases, understanding the distinction between regional and national accreditation, examining faculty qualifications and curricular requirements, and evaluating the institution’s track record through graduation rates, employment data, and student reviews. The enrollment decision is one of the most consequential financial and professional decisions that criminal justice students make, and the accreditation verification that protects that decision requires minimal effort relative to the magnitude of what is at stake.

Table 1. Choosing an Accredited Online School by Student Type

Student Type	Priority Factors	Recommended Accredited Schools	Key Benefits to Verify
Working police officers	Async delivery, agency tuition reimbursement eligibility, policing faculty	ASU, Penn State, George Mason, MSU	Tuition reimbursement compatibility, shift-friendly scheduling
Correctional professionals	EBP/RNR curriculum, corrections faculty, practicum options	Cincinnati, Sam Houston State, UNO	Corrections-specific coursework, RNR framework coverage
Active-duty military	Deployment flexibility, DoD MOU, military credit transfer	AMU, UMGC, Excelsior, Penn State	TA eligibility, deployment policies, military credit acceptance
Veterans	GI Bill acceptance, Yellow Ribbon, veteran support services	ASU, Penn State, AMU, UMGC, Liberty	GI Bill housing allowance rates, Yellow Ribbon participation
Career changers	Transfer credit policies, accelerated options, career services	SNHU, CSU Global, Purdue Global, UMass Lowell	Maximum transfer credits accepted, career transition support
Degree completers	Prior credit evaluation, flexible admission, affordable completion	SNHU, Excelsior, CSU Global, Purdue Global	Transfer credit evaluation, time-to-completion estimate
Graduate school aspirants	Research university affiliation, faculty research, methods training	ASU, Penn State, George Mason, UCF, FIU	Faculty mentoring access, research opportunities, methods depth
Crime analysts	GIS training, IACA alignment, data science skills	ASU, MSU, Sam Houston State	GIS software access, analytical coursework, certification prep

Conclusion

Choosing an accredited online school for criminal justice education is a decision that shapes career trajectories, financial obligations, and professional opportunities for years or decades after enrollment. The accreditation status of an institution is not one factor among many — it is the threshold requirement that determines whether all subsequent considerations (curriculum, faculty, cost, scheduling) are worth evaluating at all. Students who verify accreditation through official Department of Education and CHEA directories before enrolling, who understand the distinction between regional and national accreditation and its implications for credit transfer and employer recognition, and who evaluate accredited schools against the quality indicators and student-type decision frameworks presented in this article make enrollment decisions that protect their investment and support their goals. The accredited online criminal justice schools profiled here — from research universities to primarily online institutions to community colleges — represent the legitimate options available to students seeking credentials that employers recognize, that graduate programs accept, and that the criminal justice profession and the communities it serves can trust as evidence of genuine educational preparation.

References

Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Anderson Publishing.
Carter, D. L. (2009). Law enforcement intelligence: A guide for state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies (2nd ed.). U.S. Department of Justice.
Clear, T. R. (2001). Has academic criminal justice come of age? Justice Quarterly, 18(4), 709–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820100095071
Cohn, E. G., & Farrington, D. P. (2014). Publication productivity of criminologists. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 25(3), 275–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2014.921730
Frost, N. A., & Clear, T. R. (2012). New directions in correctional research. Justice Quarterly, 29(5), 619–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.667141
Hilal, S. M., & Densley, J. A. (2013). Higher education and local police. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 82(5), 1–3.
Morn, F. (1995). Academic politics and the history of criminal justice education. Greenwood Press.
Mustaine, E. E., & Tewksbury, R. (2009). Trends in academic career productivity. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 20(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250903183129
Paoline, E. A., III, & Terrill, W. (2007). Police education, experience, and the use of force. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854806290239
Robinson, M. B., & Rudes, D. S. (2012). The top 20 reasons students dislike studying CJ and criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 23(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2011.606367
Sherman, L. W. (1998). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. National Institute of Justice.
Southerland, M. D. (2002). Criminal justice curricula in the United States. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820200095381
Steiner, B., Wright, E. M., & Toto, S. (2020). What matters in doctoral education in criminology and criminal justice? Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 31(2), 153–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2019.1705987
Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. E. (2011). How many are too many? Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2010.516561

Related Articles