Criminal Justice

iResearchNet




Criminal Justice > Criminology > Criminology and Criminal Justice Education > Criminal Justice Online Courses

Criminal Justice Online Courses




Criminal justice online courses deliver the core and specialized content of criminological education through digital platforms that make university-level instruction in policing, corrections, courts, criminological theory, research methods, and emerging crime areas accessible to students regardless of geographic location or scheduling constraints. As a content-focused dimension of Criminal Justice Education, understanding what specific online courses cover — their learning objectives, substantive content, methodological demands, and career applications — helps students select courses that develop genuine competencies rather than merely accumulate credits. Within the broader field of Criminology, the content of online courses reflects the discipline’s intellectual priorities and determines whether graduates of online programs acquire the same theoretical literacy, analytical reasoning, and evidence evaluation skills that the strongest residential programs develop.

Introduction

The decision to take a criminal justice course online involves more than choosing a delivery format — it requires understanding what each course type covers, what skills it develops, what level of intellectual engagement it demands, and how it connects to both the broader curriculum and the student’s professional goals. An online introduction to criminal justice course that surveys the system’s three major components at a descriptive level provides a fundamentally different educational experience than an online research methods course that requires students to design studies, analyze datasets, and evaluate the causal claims of published research (Bachman & Schutt, 2020). A policing course that examines patrol strategy through the lens of evidence-based practice and procedural justice theory develops different competencies than one that merely describes organizational charts and standard operating procedures (Tyler, 2006). The content of the course — not merely the fact that it is online — determines its educational value.

This article provides a detailed examination of what major criminal justice online courses actually teach, organized by course category: foundational core courses, criminal justice systems courses, research and analytical methods courses, specialized elective courses, and professional development and applied courses. For each category, the treatment identifies learning objectives, substantive content, the skills students should expect to develop, the institutions that offer particularly strong versions, and the career applications that each course type supports. The goal is to provide prospective students with the information necessary to evaluate not just where to take criminal justice courses online but which courses to prioritize, what to expect from each, and how individual courses fit into coherent educational and professional development strategies.




Foundational Core Courses

Introduction to Criminal Justice

The introduction to criminal justice course serves as the gateway to the discipline for most undergraduate students, providing a survey of the criminal justice system’s structure, operations, and the constitutional principles that govern its exercise of state authority. Online versions of this course — among the most widely offered criminal justice courses at every institutional level — typically cover the nature and measurement of crime (using data from the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports and the Bureau of Justice Statistics‘ National Crime Victimization Survey), the organization and operations of law enforcement agencies, the adjudicatory process from arrest through sentencing, the correctional system including both institutional and community supervision, and contemporary issues such as racial disparities, technology in criminal justice, and the tension between crime control and due process models (Walker & Katz, 2018). The course provides the institutional map that subsequent courses will explore in greater depth, making the quality of this introductory experience consequential for students’ understanding of the field as a whole.

Strong online introductory courses go beyond institutional description to introduce analytical frameworks that help students think critically about the system they are studying. Herbert Packer’s (1968) crime control and due process models provide a conceptual framework for understanding the competing values that animate criminal justice policy. Samuel Walker’s (1993) “wedding cake” model illustrates how case seriousness determines processing — challenging the assumption that all cases receive equal institutional attention. The concept of discretion — the authority of individual actors (police officers, prosecutors, judges, parole boards) to make decisions within broad legal parameters — introduces students to the human judgment that shapes system outcomes as powerfully as formal rules (Spohn, 2014). Programs at institutions such as Arizona State University, Penn State World Campus, and University of Central Florida offer introductory courses that integrate these analytical frameworks into what might otherwise be a purely descriptive survey.

The assessment structure of online introductory courses varies enormously and provides a reliable indicator of intellectual ambition. Courses that assess learning exclusively through multiple-choice examinations test factual recall — names of agencies, definitions of legal terms, procedural sequences — without developing the analytical reasoning the discipline values (Bloom, 1956). Courses that supplement or replace objective examinations with written assignments — short essays analyzing criminal justice controversies, case study analyses applying course concepts to real incidents, discussion forum contributions that require evidence-based argumentation — develop critical thinking skills that transfer to subsequent coursework and professional practice. Prospective students should review syllabi (when available) or contact instructors to understand assessment expectations before enrolling (Southerland, 2002).

Criminological Theory

Online criminological theory courses introduce the major explanatory frameworks for criminal behavior — the intellectual foundation on which all subsequent criminological analysis builds. The standard theory course progresses chronologically from the classical school (Beccaria, Bentham) through biological positivism (Lombroso), the Chicago School (Shaw, McKay, Sutherland), strain theory (Merton, Agnew), social control and self-control theories (Hirschi, Gottfredson), social learning theory (Akers), labeling theory (Lemert, Becker), critical and feminist perspectives (Chesney-Lind, DeKeseredy), and developmental/life-course approaches (Moffitt, Sampson & Laub) — presenting each framework’s core propositions, empirical support, policy implications, and limitations (Cullen, Agnew, & Wilcox, 2014).

The pedagogical challenge of teaching theory online is creating the analytical engagement that residential theory courses achieve through Socratic questioning, seminar discussion, and real-time debate among students with different perspectives. The best online theory courses address this challenge through structured discussion forums that require students to argue for and against specific theoretical positions using empirical evidence, case analysis assignments that require applying multiple theories to the same criminal event or pattern, and comparative essays that evaluate theories against each other on criteria such as empirical support, logical consistency, scope, and policy utility (Cooper, Walsh, & Ellis, 2010). These assignments develop the capacity to use theory as an analytical tool — to explain, predict, and evaluate — rather than merely memorize and recite theoretical propositions. Programs at Florida State University, the University of Cincinnati, and George Mason University offer theory courses taught by faculty whose own research tests and extends the theoretical frameworks they teach, bringing current scholarly debates directly into the online classroom.

Theory courses that integrate race, gender, and class analysis throughout the curriculum rather than confining these perspectives to a single week or module produce graduates with more sophisticated analytical capabilities than those that treat critical perspectives as supplementary add-ons to a mainstream canon. The inclusion of scholars such as W.E.B. Du Bois, whose pioneering work on race and crime predated much of the canonical Chicago School research, and feminist criminologists such as Meda Chesney-Lind and Kathleen Daly, whose pathways research transformed understanding of female offending, enriches the theoretical curriculum in ways that reflect the discipline’s actual intellectual diversity rather than its historical demographic narrowness (Gabbidon, 2007; Potter, 2015).

Criminal Justice Systems Courses

Policing Courses

Online policing courses examine the organization, strategies, culture, and accountability mechanisms of law enforcement agencies — the most visible component of the criminal justice system and the one most frequently debated in public discourse. Substantive content typically includes the history and structure of American policing (from the political era through the professional and community policing eras), patrol strategies and their effectiveness (including the evidence base from the Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment and subsequent hot spots policing research), criminal investigation procedures, police discretion and decision-making, use of force policies and controversies, police-community relations, and the procedural justice framework that has reshaped scholarly and practitioner understanding of police legitimacy (Braga, Papachristos, & Hureau, 2014; Tyler, 2006).

Strong online policing courses incorporate evidence from the substantial body of experimental and quasi-experimental research that has accumulated in policing studies, connecting operational practices to their evidentiary foundations. David Weisburd’s (2015) research on the criminology of place and its implications for patrol allocation, Lawrence Sherman’s work on evidence-based policing (Sherman, 1998), and Tom Tyler’s procedural justice framework provide analytical tools that distinguish evidence-informed policing instruction from the descriptive institutional surveys that weaker courses offer. Programs at George Mason University — home of the Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy — the University of Maryland, and Michigan State University offer policing courses taught by faculty whose research has directly shaped the evidence base for policing practice (Weisburd & Neyroud, 2011).

Body-worn camera footage, dashboard camera recordings, and real-world case studies from police encounters provide multimedia teaching materials that online policing courses can deploy effectively — in some cases more effectively than residential courses, as digital delivery allows repeated viewing, slow-motion analysis, and structured annotation of video materials that live classroom screenings may not permit. Online courses that integrate these visual materials with analytical frameworks — asking students to evaluate officer decision-making against procedural justice principles, to assess whether a use of force incident complied with department policy and constitutional standards, or to analyze the communication dynamics of police-citizen encounters — provide experiential learning opportunities that approach the pedagogical power of ride-alongs and structured observations (Paoline & Terrill, 2007).

Corrections and Courts Courses

Online corrections courses examine the institutional and community components of the American correctional system — a system that supervises approximately 5.5 million adults through incarceration, probation, and parole and that has become one of the most extensively studied dimensions of American criminal justice. Course content typically includes the history and philosophy of punishment (retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation), institutional corrections (prison classification, management, culture, and programming), community corrections (probation, parole, intermediate sanctions), the evidence base for correctional rehabilitation (particularly the Risk-Needs-Responsivity framework), reentry challenges and programming, and the causes and consequences of mass incarceration (Andrews & Bonta, 2010; Travis, Western, & Redburn, 2014).

The RNR framework, developed by Don Andrews and James Bonta, has become the dominant paradigm for evidence-based corrections and deserves substantial treatment in any serious corrections course. Programs affiliated with the University of Cincinnati’s Corrections Institute — which has provided training and technical assistance to corrections agencies nationwide in RNR implementation — offer corrections courses with particular depth in evidence-based programming (Latessa & Lovins, 2010). Joan Petersilia’s (2003) research on prisoner reentry and the barriers that returning citizens face — housing discrimination, employment restrictions, family disruption, untreated behavioral health conditions — provides essential content for corrections courses that address the full cycle of incarceration from admission through release and community reintegration.

Online courts and sentencing courses examine the adjudicatory process from charging through disposition, including prosecutorial discretion, plea bargaining (which resolves approximately 95 percent of criminal cases without trial), jury selection and trial procedure, sentencing frameworks (determinate, indeterminate, guideline-based), and the operation of problem-solving courts such as drug courts and mental health courts. Cassia Spohn’s (2014) research on racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing provides empirical grounding for what might otherwise be abstract discussions of sentencing policy. The expansion of problem-solving courts — evaluated through dozens of experimental and quasi-experimental studies, with drug courts accumulating the strongest evidence base — represents an institutional innovation that courses should examine as both a policy development and a research case study (Marlowe, Hardin, & Fox, 2016). Programs at Northeastern University, Indiana University, and Rutgers University-Newark offer strong courts and sentencing coursework drawing on faculty expertise in these areas.

Research and Analytical Methods Courses

Research Methods and Statistics

Online research methods courses develop the evidence evaluation skills that distinguish educated criminal justice professionals from those who rely on intuition, anecdote, and conventional wisdom. These courses cover research design (experimental, quasi-experimental, survey, observational, qualitative), measurement and operationalization, sampling, threats to internal and external validity, research ethics, and the interpretation of published research findings (Bachman & Schutt, 2020). The pedagogical goal is to produce graduates who can critically evaluate the claims made in program evaluations, risk assessments, policy reports, and media coverage of crime research — competencies that are essential for evidence-informed professional practice and that the evidence-based practice movement has made a baseline expectation for criminal justice careers (Sherman, 1998).

Online statistics courses introduce descriptive statistics, probability, hypothesis testing, bivariate analysis, and regression — the analytical tools necessary to understand the quantitative research that dominates the discipline’s leading journals. The most effective online statistics courses use criminal justice datasets rather than generic textbook examples, requiring students to analyze real sentencing data, victimization survey results, or crime trend statistics using software that they will encounter in professional settings (Piquero & Weisburd, 2010). Courses that provide instruction in R — free, open-source, and increasingly standard in the discipline — equip students with programming skills that transfer to data science career pathways. Courses using SPSS or Stata prepare students for the statistical packages most commonly used in criminal justice agency research divisions and academic settings. The Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) archives hundreds of criminal justice datasets that online methods and statistics courses can use for hands-on analysis projects regardless of students’ physical location.

The availability of free data resources has made online methods and statistics courses potentially more applied and data-rich than their residential counterparts. The Bureau of Justice Statistics provides downloadable datasets from the National Crime Victimization Survey, the Census of Jails, the Survey of Inmates, and other data collections. The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports and National Incident-Based Reporting System data are freely accessible for analysis. State-level open data portals increasingly provide crime incident records, use-of-force reports, court disposition data, and correctional population statistics in machine-readable formats that students can analyze with standard statistical software. Online courses that capitalize on these resources provide data analysis experiences that develop directly applicable skills — a pedagogical advantage of the digital environment that the strongest programs have learned to exploit (Weisburd, 2015).

Crime Analysis and GIS Courses

Online crime analysis courses develop the specialized analytical skills required for positions in police crime analysis units, regional intelligence centers, and security consulting firms. Course content typically includes crime pattern analysis (identifying series, sprees, and hot spots), temporal analysis (examining crime trends by time of day, day of week, and season), geographic analysis using GIS software (QGIS is free; ArcGIS requires a license), intelligence analysis (link analysis, threat assessment, strategic analysis), and the communication of analytical findings through briefings, reports, and data visualizations (Santos, 2017). The International Association of Crime Analysts (IACA) has published competency standards for crime analysts that several programs use as curricular benchmarks, and some online crime analysis courses are specifically designed to prepare students for the IACA certification examination.

GIS courses teach students to create crime maps, conduct spatial analysis, calculate crime density, identify hot spots using kernel density estimation, analyze spatial-temporal patterns, and produce cartographic products that communicate analytical findings to command staff and policymakers. The increasing availability of geocoded crime data from municipal open data portals, combined with free GIS software and spatial data from the U.S. Census Bureau‘s TIGER files and the National Neighborhood Data Archive, has made GIS-based crime analysis instruction feasible in online formats that were impractical when the technology required expensive institutional infrastructure. Programs at Michigan State University, Sam Houston State University, and several institutions with applied criminology concentrations offer strong online crime analysis coursework.

Specialized and Emerging Courses

Cybercrime and Digital Forensics

Online cybercrime courses address one of criminal justice’s fastest-growing problem areas — technology-enabled offending that includes identity theft, online fraud, ransomware, phishing, child exploitation, cyberstalking, data breaches, cryptocurrency-facilitated crime, and state-sponsored hacking. Course content typically covers the typology and prevalence of cybercrime, the application of traditional criminological theories (particularly routine activities theory and rational choice theory) to online environments, digital evidence collection and preservation, cybersecurity fundamentals, the legal frameworks governing digital searches and electronic surveillance, and the international cooperation challenges that cross-border cybercrime creates (Holt & Bossler, 2016). The inherently digital nature of the subject matter makes online delivery particularly appropriate for cybercrime courses, as students study technology-enabled crime using the same technological environment in which that crime occurs.

Digital forensics courses provide more technical training in the examination of electronic evidence — computers, mobile devices, cloud storage, network logs, and social media accounts — that has become central to criminal investigation and prosecution across offense categories. Content includes forensic imaging, data recovery, file system analysis, network forensics, mobile device examination, and the legal standards governing the admissibility of digital evidence. Programs at Michigan State University and several institutions with forensic science concentrations offer online digital forensics coursework. Students should note that the most technical digital forensics courses may require software installations, virtual machine configurations, and computing resources that exceed the requirements of standard social science courses (Brayne, 2020).

Juvenile Justice and Victimology

Online juvenile justice courses examine the distinctive legal framework, institutional structures, and policy debates governing the treatment of youth in the justice system. Content covers the history and philosophy of the juvenile court, adolescent brain development and its implications for culpability and intervention, diversion programs and their effectiveness, the consequences of waiver to adult court, evidence-based juvenile interventions (multisystemic therapy, functional family therapy, juvenile drug courts), and the racial disparities that pervade juvenile justice processing (Feld, 2017). The developmental perspective — grounded in neuroscience research demonstrating that the prefrontal cortex does not fully mature until the mid-twenties and that adolescents differ categorically from adults in impulse control, future orientation, and susceptibility to peer influence (Steinberg, 2008) — has fundamentally reshaped juvenile justice policy and should receive substantial treatment in any serious juvenile justice course. The Supreme Court decisions in Roper v. Simmons (2005), Graham v. Florida (2010), and Miller v. Alabama (2012) provide case studies in the translation of developmental science into constitutional law that illustrate the practical relevance of scholarly research.

Online victimology courses examine the patterns, consequences, and societal responses to criminal victimization — a subfield that has grown substantially since the establishment of the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) in 1984 and the expansion of victim services, victim rights legislation, and victim-centered criminal justice reforms. Course content typically covers victimization theories (lifestyle-exposure, routine activities, vulnerability), the measurement of victimization through the National Crime Victimization Survey and specialized surveys, the physical and psychological consequences of victimization (including PTSD, depression, and substance use), victim services delivery models, restorative justice approaches, and the legal rights of crime victims in the criminal justice process (Daigle, 2018). Programs at the University of South Florida and Sam Houston State University offer victimology courses with particular strength in this area. The National Organization for Victim Assistance (NOVA) and the Office for Victims of Crime (OVC) provide supplementary resources that online victimology courses can integrate as primary source material.

Race, Gender, and Special Topics

Online courses on race and criminal justice have expanded substantially in response to both scholarly developments and public demand for critical analysis of racial disparities in policing, prosecution, sentencing, and incarceration. Course content draws on the extensive empirical literature documenting disparate outcomes at every stage of criminal justice processing (Tonry, 2011; Spohn, 2014), the theoretical frameworks — including racial threat theory, structural racism analysis, and critical race criminology — that explain these disparities (Alexander, 2010; Unnever & Gabbidon, 2011), and the historical context of racialized social control from slavery through convict leasing, Jim Crow, and mass incarceration that situates contemporary disparities within longer trajectories of racial subordination (Muhammad, 2010). Programs at John Jay College, North Carolina Central University, and institutions with strong race and crime faculty offer particularly valuable online coursework in this area (Gabbidon & Greene, 2019).

Gender and crime courses examine feminist criminological theory, gendered pathways to offending, intimate partner violence, sexual assault, the experiences of women in the criminal justice workforce, and gender-responsive programming (Chesney-Lind & Pasko, 2013; Renzetti, 2013). Terrorism and homeland security courses address radicalization, political violence, counterterrorism policy, and the institutional structures created after September 11, 2001. Drug policy courses examine the criminalization of substance use, the war on drugs and its consequences, harm reduction approaches, drug courts, and the emerging policy landscape around cannabis legalization. White-collar and corporate crime courses address financial fraud, corporate environmental harm, regulatory enforcement, and the criminological theories that explain organizational offending. Each of these specialized courses provides analytical depth in areas where the introductory curriculum can offer only cursory treatment, allowing students to develop expertise aligned with their career interests and intellectual curiosities.

Choosing and Maximizing Online Course Value

Strategic Course Selection

The strategic selection of online criminal justice courses requires aligning course choices with educational goals, career aspirations, and the specific competencies that target employers or graduate programs value. Students pursuing law enforcement careers should prioritize courses in policing, criminal investigation, constitutional law, and evidence-based practice — competencies that federal agencies such as the FBI, DEA, ATF, and Secret Service evaluate in hiring decisions. Students targeting corrections careers should emphasize courses in correctional programming, risk assessment, community supervision, and the RNR framework that dominates evidence-based corrections practice. Students preparing for graduate school should prioritize theory, research methods, and statistics courses that develop the analytical competencies doctoral programs expect, and should seek courses that produce written work products — research papers, literature reviews, data analysis reports — usable as graduate school writing samples (Steiner, Wright, & Toto, 2020).

Students supplementing residential programs with online electives from other institutions should choose courses that fill genuine gaps in their home program’s offerings rather than duplicating content already covered. A student whose home institution lacks a cybercrime course benefits from taking one online; a student whose home program offers limited GIS training can develop spatial analysis skills through an online crime analysis course from an institution with stronger technical offerings. Cross-institutional course selection requires attention to transfer credit policies — verifying in advance that the receiving institution will accept the credit, that the course meets degree requirements, and that the credit transfer will not create financial aid complications (Southerland, 2002).

Maximizing Learning in Online Courses

Students who approach online criminal justice courses with the same seriousness and engagement they would bring to residential courses — and who develop the self-regulatory skills that online delivery demands — can achieve learning outcomes that match or exceed residential instruction (Means et al., 2010). Specific strategies for maximizing online course value include treating asynchronous content as scheduled appointments rather than optional viewing, completing readings before engaging with lectures, participating substantively in discussion forums rather than posting minimally to meet requirements, starting written assignments well before deadlines to allow for revision, and actively seeking feedback from instructors through virtual office hours and email communication (Robinson & Rudes, 2012).

The writing-intensive nature of most online criminal justice courses provides opportunities for skill development that students should embrace rather than resist. Discussion forum posts, research papers, case analyses, and essay examinations all develop analytical writing skills — the capacity to construct evidence-based arguments in clear, organized prose — that represent one of the most transferable and professionally valuable outcomes of criminal justice education (Bachman & Schutt, 2020). Students who treat each writing assignment as an opportunity to practice and improve their analytical prose emerge from online courses with communication skills that distinguish them in professional settings where report writing, policy analysis, and formal correspondence are daily requirements. Students who view writing assignments as obstacles to be completed with minimum effort waste the developmental opportunity that the online format’s writing emphasis creates.

The intellectual isolation that online courses can produce — the absence of hallway conversations, study groups, and the spontaneous intellectual exchange of residential education — can be mitigated through deliberate community-building strategies. Forming virtual study groups with classmates, attending optional synchronous sessions, engaging with instructor office hours, connecting with peers through professional social media platforms, and participating in professional organizations such as the American Society of Criminology or the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences create intellectual community that supplements the structured interactions of the online course environment (Kim, Cwick, & Gertz, 2016).

Table 1. Criminal Justice Online Course Categories and Their Career Applications

Course Category Key Content Areas Primary Skills Developed Career Applications Recommended For
Introduction to CJ System overview, crime measurement, constitutional principles Institutional literacy, critical analysis of CJ policy Foundation for all CJ careers; gateway to advanced courses All students beginning CJ study
Criminological Theory Classical, sociological, developmental, critical frameworks Analytical reasoning, theory application, explanatory evaluation Graduate school preparation; policy analysis; any analytical role Students seeking analytical depth
Research Methods Research design, sampling, measurement, validity, ethics Evidence evaluation, study design, critical reading of research Research positions, program evaluation, evidence-based practice Essential for all serious CJ students
Statistics Descriptive, inferential, regression, software training Data analysis, statistical reasoning, software proficiency Crime analysis, research, policy analysis, graduate study Students targeting analytical careers
Policing Patrol strategy, use of force, procedural justice, EBP Evidence-based policing knowledge, institutional analysis Law enforcement, police research, policy consulting LE career aspirants, policy students
Corrections RNR framework, rehabilitation, reentry, mass incarceration Program evaluation, risk assessment, policy analysis Corrections management, reentry services, policy research Corrections career aspirants
Courts/Sentencing Prosecution, plea bargaining, sentencing, problem-solving courts Legal analysis, disparity analysis, policy evaluation Court administration, prosecution, defense, judicial research Legal career aspirants, policy students
Cybercrime Technology-enabled offending, digital evidence, cybersecurity Digital literacy, forensic concepts, technology policy Cybercrime investigation, digital forensics, security Technology-oriented students
Crime Analysis/GIS Spatial analysis, pattern detection, intelligence, mapping GIS proficiency, analytical briefing, data visualization Police crime analysis, fusion centers, security consulting Applied/technical career aspirants
Juvenile Justice Adolescent development, JJ institutions, EBP for youth Developmental perspective, intervention evaluation Juvenile probation, youth services, JJ policy Youth-focused career aspirants
Victimology Victimization patterns, victim services, restorative justice Victim advocacy, trauma-informed practice, service delivery Victim services, advocacy organizations, policy Victim services career aspirants
Race and CJ Racial disparities, structural racism, critical race theory Structural analysis, disparity measurement, policy critique Policy research, advocacy, academic careers, informed practice All students; essential perspective

Conclusion

Criminal justice online courses provide access to the full spectrum of criminological knowledge — from foundational surveys of the criminal justice system through advanced theoretical analysis, methodological training, and specialized study of policing, corrections, courts, cybercrime, juvenile justice, victimology, and race — in formats that accommodate the scheduling, geographic, and professional constraints that characterize the criminal justice student population. The educational value of these courses depends not on their delivery format but on their substantive content, the qualifications of their instructors, the rigor of their assessment, and the degree to which they develop genuine analytical competencies rather than merely transmitting information. Students who approach online course selection strategically — choosing courses that fill specific educational needs, that are taught by qualified faculty at accredited institutions, that require meaningful written analysis and evidence engagement, and that connect to coherent educational and professional development trajectories — position themselves to extract maximum value from the growing ecosystem of criminal justice online instruction. The discipline’s responsibility is to ensure that this ecosystem produces courses worthy of the criminal justice profession and the communities it serves — courses that develop the evidence-informed analytical reasoning that effective policing, just sentencing, rehabilitative corrections, and equitable justice require.

References

  1. Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.
  2. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Anderson Publishing.
  3. Bachman, R. D., & Schutt, R. K. (2020). The practice of research in criminology and criminal justice (7th ed.). Sage Publications.
  4. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longman.
  5. Braga, A. A., Papachristos, A. V., & Hureau, D. M. (2014). The effects of hot spots policing on crime. Justice Quarterly, 31(4), 633–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.673632
  6. Brayne, S. (2020). Predict and surveil: Data, discretion, and the future of policing. Oxford University Press.
  7. Chesney-Lind, M., & Pasko, L. (2013). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  8. Cohn, E. G., & Farrington, D. P. (2014). Publication productivity of criminologists. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 25(3), 275–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2014.921730
  9. Cooper, J. A., Walsh, A., & Ellis, L. (2010). Is criminology moving toward a paradigm shift? Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21(3), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2010.487830
  10. Cullen, F. T., Agnew, R., & Wilcox, P. (2014). Criminological theory: Past to present (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  11. Daigle, L. E. (2018). Victimology: The essentials (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  12. Feld, B. C. (2017). The evolution of the juvenile court. New York University Press.
  13. Frost, N. A., & Clear, T. R. (2012). New directions in correctional research. Justice Quarterly, 29(5), 619–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.667141
  14. Gabbidon, S. L. (2007). W.E.B. Du Bois on crime and justice. Ashgate.
  15. Gabbidon, S. L., & Greene, H. T. (2019). Race and crime (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
  16. Holt, T. J., & Bossler, A. M. (2016). Cybercrime in progress. Routledge.
  17. Kim, B., Cwick, J. M., & Gertz, M. G. (2016). An assessment of professional engagement in the top-ranked doctoral programs. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 27(4), 538–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2016.1188890
  18. Latessa, E. J., & Lovins, B. (2010). The role of offender risk assessment. Victims & Offenders, 5(3), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2010.485900
  19. Marlowe, D. B., Hardin, C. D., & Fox, C. L. (2016). Painting the current picture: A national report on drug courts. National Drug Court Institute.
  20. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning. U.S. Department of Education.
  21. Muhammad, K. G. (2010). The condemnation of blackness. Harvard University Press.
  22. Paoline, E. A., III, & Terrill, W. (2007). Police education, experience, and the use of force. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854806290239
  23. Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home. Oxford University Press.
  24. Piquero, A. R., & Weisburd, D. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of quantitative criminology. Springer.
  25. Potter, H. (2015). Intersectionality and criminology. Routledge.
  26. Renzetti, C. M. (2013). Feminist criminology. Routledge.
  27. Robinson, M. B., & Rudes, D. S. (2012). The top 20 reasons students dislike studying CJ and criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 23(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2011.606367
  28. Santos, R. B. (2017). Crime analysis with crime mapping (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  29. Sherman, L. W. (1998). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. National Institute of Justice.
  30. Southerland, M. D. (2002). Criminal justice curricula in the United States. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820200095381
  31. Spohn, C. (2014). Racial disparities in prosecution, sentencing, and punishment. In S. Bucerius & M. Tonry (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ethnicity, crime, and immigration (pp. 166–193). Oxford University Press.
  32. Steiner, B., Wright, E. M., & Toto, S. (2020). What matters in doctoral education in criminology and criminal justice? Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 31(2), 153–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2019.1705987
  33. Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28(1), 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002
  34. Tonry, M. (2011). Punishing race: A continuing American dilemma. Oxford University Press.
  35. Travis, J., Western, B., & Redburn, S. (Eds.). (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States. National Academies Press.
  36. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
  37. Unnever, J. D., & Gabbidon, S. L. (2011). A theory of African American offending. Routledge.
  38. Walker, S., & Katz, C. M. (2018). The police in America (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  39. Weisburd, D. (2015). The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology, 53(2), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12070
  40. Weisburd, D., & Neyroud, P. (2011). Police science: Toward a new paradigm. New Perspectives in Policing, January, 1–23.

Related Articles