Criminology Schools and Colleges

Criminology schools and colleges constitute the institutional infrastructure through which the discipline trains its scholars, practitioners, and policymakers, ranging from elite doctoral programs at research universities to community college associate degree programs that serve as entry points for students beginning their criminal justice education. As a structural feature of Criminology and Criminal Justice Education, the diversity of institutional types reflects both the discipline’s broad accessibility and its uneven quality — a landscape in which some programs provide rigorous, research-informed education that prepares graduates for intellectually demanding careers while others offer minimal academic substance behind a credential whose value depends entirely on the employer’s inability to distinguish it from more rigorous alternatives. Within the broader field of Criminology, the institutional landscape determines how many students the discipline reaches, what quality of education they receive, and whether the field’s collective educational enterprise serves its scholarly and professional mission or merely generates credentials.

Introduction

The institutional landscape of criminology and criminal justice education in the United States is extraordinarily diverse by any measure. More than eight hundred colleges and universities offer degree programs in criminal justice or criminology at levels ranging from associate degrees through doctorates, enrolling hundreds of thousands of students annually and producing tens of thousands of graduates each year (Morn, 1995). These programs are housed in organizational units that range from freestanding colleges of criminology to departments within colleges of arts and sciences, social and behavioral sciences, or public affairs, to interdisciplinary programs that combine criminal justice with sociology, political science, or public administration, to community college divisions that may combine criminal justice with homeland security, fire science, or emergency management.

This institutional diversity is both a strength and a vulnerability. The strength lies in accessibility: criminal justice programs at community colleges, regional state universities, online institutions, and historically Black colleges and universities provide educational opportunities to student populations — working professionals, first-generation college students, racial and ethnic minorities, students in rural areas — that more selective institutions may not effectively serve (Gabbidon, Penn, & Richards, 2003). The vulnerability lies in quality variation: the absence of mandatory program-level accreditation means that there is no external mechanism for ensuring that all programs meet minimum standards of intellectual rigor, and the market incentives that drive enrollment at tuition-dependent institutions do not always align with the educational quality that students, employers, and the public deserve (Clear, 2001).

Understanding the institutional landscape matters for prospective students choosing where to study, for employers evaluating the credentials of job candidates, for policymakers considering educational quality standards, and for the discipline as a whole as it considers whether its educational infrastructure serves its collective interests. This article surveys the major categories of criminology and criminal justice programs — research universities, teaching-focused institutions, community colleges, online programs, and minority-serving institutions — with attention to the distinctive features, strengths, challenges, and specific programs that characterize each.

Research Universities and Doctoral Programs

Elite Doctoral Programs

Research universities — classified as R1 (very high research activity) or R2 (high research activity) in the Carnegie Classification system — house the doctoral programs that produce the discipline’s faculty, generate its most visible scholarship, and set the intellectual standards against which other programs are implicitly measured. A small number of consistently top-ranked programs dominate the disciplinary landscape in ways discussed in detail in the article on criminology programs at top universities within this category (Cohn & Farrington, 2014).

Florida State University’s College of Criminology and Criminal Justice is the only freestanding college of criminology in the United States, an organizational structure that provides exceptional administrative autonomy and resource access. Its large faculty supports research across multiple subfields — biosocial criminology, life-course development, policing, cybercrime, and corrections — and its doctoral program consistently ranks among the nation’s best. The University of Cincinnati’s School of Criminal Justice has built an internationally recognized identity around correctional rehabilitation and evidence-based practice, with its Corrections Institute providing training and technical assistance to corrections agencies nationwide (Latessa & Lovins, 2010). The University of Maryland’s Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice has been a dominant force in experimental criminology, evidence-based policing, and advanced quantitative methods for decades, producing graduates who hold faculty positions at research universities across the country (Sherman, 1998).

The University at Albany’s School of Criminal Justice, one of the oldest independent criminal justice programs in the United States, maintains a distinguished record in policing research, organizational studies, and the training of disciplinary leaders. Penn State University’s Department of Sociology and Criminology benefits from integration with a major sociology department, providing students with broad social science training alongside criminological specialization and producing influential scholarship on developmental criminology, communities and crime, and the consequences of incarceration (Sampson, 2012). Arizona State University’s School of Criminology and Criminal Justice has risen rapidly in national rankings through aggressive faculty hiring and research center development, building particular strengths in policing, sentencing, immigration, and evidence-based policy.

Additional Research-Intensive Programs

Beyond the most frequently cited programs, a substantial number of additional research universities offer doctoral training that produces competitive scholars and influential research. Rutgers University-Newark’s School of Criminal Justice maintains a strong reputation in policing, organizational theory, and urban crime, located in a metropolitan area that provides rich opportunities for field research and agency partnerships. Michigan State University’s School of Criminal Justice offers one of the oldest criminal justice doctoral programs in the country, with particular strengths in policing, cybercrime, and international criminal justice. Northeastern University’s School of Criminology and Criminal Justice is known for its research on violence, youth gangs, and evidence-based policy, and its Boston location provides access to a dense network of criminal justice agencies and policy organizations.

George Mason University’s Department of Criminology, Law and Society has built a distinctive identity around evidence-based crime policy, housing the Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy that has become one of the most visible research-practice partnership models in the discipline (Weisburd & Neyroud, 2011). Sam Houston State University’s College of Criminal Justice is one of the largest criminal justice programs in the United States by enrollment and has a strong publication record among its faculty. the University of Missouri-St. Louis’s Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice has established strengths in policing research, juvenile justice, and the study of violence. Indiana University’s Department of Criminal Justice offers a doctoral program with particular strengths in corrections, law and society, and criminal justice policy.

The University of South Florida’s Department of Criminology has built research strength in victimology, sex offender policy, and evidence-based corrections. Temple University’s Department of Criminal Justice has contributed to policing research, neighborhood crime, and the study of urban violence. the University of Central Florida’s Department of Criminal Justice has grown substantially and developed strengths in terrorism, cybercrime, and statistical methodology. The University of Delaware’s Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice combines criminological training with sociological breadth in ways that facilitate interdisciplinary scholarship (Savelsberg & Sampson, 2002).

The organizational location of criminology at research universities varies and carries implications for intellectual orientation and resource access. Freestanding schools or colleges — Florida State, Albany, Rutgers-Newark — command greater administrative autonomy, budgetary independence, and institutional visibility than departments housed within larger colleges (Laub, 2004). Departments integrated with sociology — Penn State, the University of Delaware — may sacrifice some autonomy but gain access to broader disciplinary resources, methodological training, and intellectual cross-fertilization. The choice between these models reflects institutional histories, faculty preferences, and assessments of whether the benefits of independence outweigh the advantages of integration.

Teaching-Focused Institutions and Master’s Programs

Regional Universities and Professional Preparation

Master’s-granting and teaching-focused universities house the majority of criminology and criminal justice programs in the United States, serving the largest share of students nationally and producing the majority of graduates who enter criminal justice careers at the bachelor’s and master’s levels (Clear, 2001). These programs prioritize undergraduate instruction and professional preparation, with faculty carrying heavier teaching loads — often four courses per semester compared to two or three at R1 institutions — and institutional reward structures weighting teaching quality more heavily relative to research productivity, though the balance varies across institutions (Southerland, 2002).

Prominent teaching-focused and master’s-granting programs include John Jay College of Criminal Justice (City University of New York), one of the most distinctive criminal justice institutions in the country. John Jay is a senior college within CUNY devoted entirely to criminal justice, forensic science, and public service education, offering bachelor’s and master’s degrees across multiple criminal justice specializations and serving one of the most diverse student bodies of any criminal justice program in the nation. Its location in New York City provides unparalleled access to the nation’s largest police department, the federal court system, and a dense network of policy organizations, victim services, and criminal justice agencies. Bridgewater State University in Massachusetts offers a well-regarded criminal justice program with strong practitioner connections and community-based learning opportunities. Weber State University in Utah provides criminal justice education with a Western regional focus and strong ties to state law enforcement agencies.

The University of Central Missouri’s Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology serves a largely regional student population with strong practitioner preparation. Boise State University’s School of Public Service houses a criminal justice program that combines academic rigor with applied professional preparation, benefiting from partnerships with Idaho criminal justice agencies. Radford University’s Department of Criminal Justice in Virginia provides undergraduate and graduate education with a strong focus on forensic science and investigative techniques. Westfield State University offers criminal justice education that integrates liberal arts perspectives with professional preparation. California State University, Long Beach’s School of Criminology, Criminal Justice, and Emergency Management provides undergraduate and graduate education serving the nation’s largest state university system.

The pedagogical strengths of teaching-focused programs should not be underestimated. Faculty whose primary professional identity centers on teaching rather than research publication may invest more time in course design, classroom innovation, student mentoring, and the development of pedagogical approaches that serve diverse student populations effectively (Rockell, 2009). Smaller class sizes allow the kind of discussion-based, interactive instruction that large lectures at research universities cannot accommodate. Internship and field placement programs at teaching institutions are often closely connected to local criminal justice agencies, providing students with professional exposure and networking opportunities that rival or exceed those available at more prestigious institutions (Stichman & Farkas, 2005).

Vulnerabilities and Quality Variation

The vulnerabilities of teaching-focused programs lie primarily in resource constraints and faculty workload pressures. Heavy teaching loads leave faculty with limited time for scholarly activity, potentially disconnecting them from the discipline’s intellectual frontiers and reducing their capacity to incorporate current research into their teaching (Kim, Cwick, & Gertz, 2016). Limited library budgets may restrict access to the journal databases and data resources that support rigorous instruction and student research. Smaller faculties mean fewer elective offerings, less substantive specialization, and reduced ability to cover the discipline’s methodological breadth. Programs with high proportions of adjunct faculty — instructors hired on per-course contracts without benefits, job security, or institutional integration — face particular quality challenges, as adjunct reliance can produce curricular fragmentation, inconsistent pedagogical standards, and limited student access to sustained mentoring (Frost & Clear, 2012).

The Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences certification standards provide one framework for establishing minimum curricular expectations across institutional types, evaluating programs against criteria that include curricular content, faculty qualifications, and student outcomes. However, participation in ACJS certification remains voluntary, and only a small proportion of the hundreds of criminal justice programs in the United States have sought certification — meaning that the vast majority operate without discipline-specific quality review beyond general institutional accreditation (Bernard & Engel, 2001). Students evaluating programs at teaching-focused institutions should investigate faculty credentials and research activity, course catalogs for methodological depth, internship placement structures, and post-graduation employment outcomes rather than relying solely on institutional reputation or marketing materials.

Community Colleges and Associate Degree Programs

Access, Demographics, and Workforce Entry

Community colleges represent the most accessible tier of the criminology education landscape, serving students who may be beginning their college education, transitioning from military service, returning to school after periods of employment, or pursuing credentials for entry-level criminal justice positions. Associate degree programs in criminal justice — typically requiring 60 credit hours completed over two years — provide foundational coursework in criminal justice systems, criminological theory (often at an introductory level), and substantive areas such as policing, corrections, and juvenile justice, along with general education requirements in English, mathematics, and social sciences (Morn, 1995).

Community college criminal justice programs with notable reputations include Northern Virginia Community College, one of the largest community college systems in the nation, which offers criminal justice pathways that articulate with four-year programs at Virginia’s public universities. Miami Dade College in Florida serves a highly diverse student population and offers associate degrees and articulation pathways to Florida’s state university system. Community College of Philadelphia provides criminal justice education in an urban setting with strong connections to Philadelphia’s extensive criminal justice infrastructure. Santa Ana College in California houses one of the largest criminal justice programs in the California Community College system and maintains partnerships with regional law enforcement agencies. Greenville Technical College in South Carolina offers a criminal justice program with particularly strong law enforcement training connections.

The students that community colleges serve are demographically distinct from those at four-year institutions — typically older, more racially and ethnically diverse, more likely to be first-generation college students, more likely to be working while attending school, and more likely to come from lower-income backgrounds. These demographics make community colleges critically important for diversifying the criminal justice workforce and for providing educational access to populations that selective four-year institutions may not effectively reach (Gabbidon, Penn, & Richards, 2003).

Quality Challenges and Transfer Pathways

The quality challenges facing community college criminal justice programs are significant and structural. Faculty at community colleges carry very heavy teaching loads — often five or more courses per semester — with minimal time for the professional development, scholarly activity, or curricular innovation that research-informed teaching requires. Many community college criminal justice courses are taught by adjunct instructors whose primary employment is in criminal justice agencies and whose teaching reflects practitioner experience rather than scholarly training — a characteristic that provides valuable practical perspective but may come at the cost of theoretical depth, methodological rigor, and engagement with current research findings (Southerland, 2002). Library resources, computing infrastructure, and institutional support for student research are typically more limited than at four-year institutions, constraining the scope of assignments and projects that courses can incorporate.

Transfer articulation agreements between community colleges and four-year institutions, while essential for students planning to continue their education, vary in scope and coverage and may result in credit loss that extends time-to-degree and increases educational costs. States with well-developed articulation systems — such as Florida’s common course numbering system, Virginia’s guaranteed admission agreements, and California’s extensive articulation network — facilitate smoother transfers than states with less coordinated systems. Students at community colleges who plan to transfer should identify their intended four-year institution early, consult articulation guides to ensure their coursework will transfer efficiently, and develop relationships with advisors at both the community college and the receiving institution (Tewksbury & Mustaine, 2011).

Online Programs

University-Affiliated Online Programs

Online criminal justice programs have grown rapidly since the early 2000s, driven by advances in educational technology, the flexibility demands of working professionals, and the revenue opportunities that online enrollment creates for institutions. Criminal justice has become one of the most popular online degree fields at both the undergraduate and graduate levels, with programs offered by research universities, regional institutions, and for-profit educational companies (Frost & Clear, 2012). The growth has expanded access to criminal justice education for populations that face barriers to residential attendance — working practitioners, military personnel, geographically isolated students, parents with childcare responsibilities — representing a genuine equity contribution.

Online programs operated by established universities with strong academic reputations maintain admission standards, employ full-time faculty, and deliver instruction that approaches the quality of their residential counterparts. Penn State World Campus offers both bachelor’s and master’s degrees in criminal justice through Penn State’s established criminology faculty, providing access to the same academic resources and faculty expertise available to residential students. Arizona State University Online has developed one of the largest and most respected online criminal justice programs in the country, leveraging ASU’s strong research faculty and innovative educational technology. The University of Cincinnati’s online master’s program in criminal justice integrates the program’s evidence-based corrections focus into an online format that serves working professionals nationwide. George Mason University offers online undergraduate and graduate programs through its Department of Criminology, Law and Society.

For-Profit, Military, and Quality Considerations

University of the Cumberlands offers an affordable online master’s in criminal justice. Liberty University operates one of the largest online criminal justice programs in the country, though its ideological orientation and pedagogical approach differ substantially from mainstream academic programs. American Military University (part of the American Public University System) specifically serves military and veteran populations through online criminal justice programs designed for the unique scheduling and deployment challenges that military students face. Purdue University Global provides online criminal justice education oriented toward working adults.

The quality variation among online programs is extreme, and students must evaluate specific programs carefully. Key quality indicators include the proportion of courses taught by full-time versus adjunct faculty, the institution’s regional accreditation status, the student-to-faculty ratio, whether the program requires synchronous interaction or relies exclusively on asynchronous content, the availability of advising and mentoring, and the program’s graduation and employment rates (Robinson & Rudes, 2012). The National Center for Education Statistics‘ College Navigator tool provides some of this information for federally recognized institutions. Students should be particularly cautious of programs that employ aggressive marketing, promise unrealistic career outcomes, or charge tuition substantially above comparable programs without demonstrating superior educational quality.

Historically Black Colleges, Minority-Serving Institutions, and Specialized Schools

HBCUs and Their Distinctive Contributions

Historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) and other minority-serving institutions (MSIs) play a distinctive and important role in the criminology education landscape. HBCUs have educated a disproportionate share of Black criminal justice professionals and have produced scholars who have contributed significantly to criminological knowledge, particularly in the study of race, crime, and justice (Gabbidon, Penn, & Richards, 2003). Grambling State University’s Criminal Justice Program in Louisiana has a long history of producing criminal justice graduates who serve in agencies across the South. North Carolina Central University’s Department of Criminal Justice offers undergraduate and graduate programs that combine academic rigor with attention to the racial dimensions of criminal justice that HBCU institutional cultures foreground. Florida A&M University’s Division of Criminal Justice provides criminal justice education within one of the nation’s largest and most prominent HBCUs. Howard University — often called the “Mecca” of Black higher education — offers sociology and criminal justice coursework that centers race, class, and structural inequality in ways that shape students’ analytical frameworks from the outset. Southern University in Baton Rouge offers criminal justice education serving the Louisiana HBCU system.

The institutional cultures of HBCUs — characterized by attention to the experiences and perspectives of Black students, faculty mentoring traditions that emphasize holistic student development, and curricula that center rather than marginalize racial analysis — provide educational environments qualitatively different from those at predominantly white institutions (Peterson, 2012). Hispanic-serving institutions (HSIs), tribal colleges and universities, and Asian American and Pacific Islander-serving institutions serve analogous functions for their respective communities. John Jay College of Criminal Justice (CUNY), while not formally classified as an MSI, serves one of the most racially and ethnically diverse student bodies in criminal justice education and has developed academic programs that reflect the multicultural communities of New York City.

Specialized Programs and Emerging Models

Several institutions have developed distinctive programmatic models that do not fit neatly into conventional institutional categories. The Citadel and the United States Military Academy at West Point offer criminal justice-related coursework within military institutional frameworks that combine academic education with leadership development and disciplinary structure. Roger Williams University’s School of Justice Studies integrates criminal justice with legal studies and public policy in ways that prepare students for careers spanning the justice system’s multiple institutional domains. Marymount University’s Criminology and Criminal Justice program provides a liberal arts-grounded approach that connects crime study to broader humanistic inquiry.

The pipeline from MSI criminal justice programs to doctoral study at research universities represents a critical juncture for the discipline’s diversification. Students who complete strong undergraduate or master’s programs at MSIs but who lack the mentoring, research exposure, and institutional connections that facilitate admission to top doctoral programs may not pursue the advanced training necessary for academic careers. Programs and organizations that deliberately bridge this gap — through targeted recruitment at MSIs, pipeline fellowships, and the Ronald E. McNair Post-Baccalaureate Achievement Program that prepares underrepresented students for doctoral study — address one of the most consequential structural barriers to diversifying the discipline’s scholarly workforce (Unnever & Owusu-Bempah, 2019).

Table 1. Selected Criminology and Criminal Justice Programs by Institution Type

Institution	Type	Location	Degree Levels	Notable Strengths
Florida State University	R1 (Freestanding College)	Tallahassee, FL	BA, MS, PhD	Biosocial criminology, life-course, policing; only freestanding CJ college
University of Cincinnati	R1	Cincinnati, OH	BA, MS, PhD	Evidence-based corrections, RNR framework, Corrections Institute
University of Maryland	R1	College Park, MD	BA, MA, PhD	Experimental criminology, evidence-based policing, advanced methods
University at Albany (SUNY)	R1 (School)	Albany, NY	BA, MA, PhD	Policing, organizational studies; one of oldest independent CJ programs
Penn State University	R1	University Park, PA	BA, MA, PhD	Developmental criminology, communities and crime, sociology integration
Arizona State University	R1	Phoenix, AZ	BA, MS, PhD	Policing, sentencing, immigration; rapid institutional growth
George Mason University	R1	Fairfax, VA	BA, MA, PhD	Evidence-based crime policy, CEBCP research center
Rutgers University-Newark	R1 (School)	Newark, NJ	BA, MA, PhD	Policing, organizational theory, urban crime
Michigan State University	R1	East Lansing, MI	BA, MS, PhD	Policing, cybercrime, international CJ
Northeastern University	R1	Boston, MA	BA, MS, PhD	Violence, youth gangs, evidence-based policy
John Jay College (CUNY)	Teaching/Master’s	New York, NY	BA, MA	NYC location, diverse student body, forensic science, multiple specializations
Sam Houston State University	R2	Huntsville, TX	BA, MA, PhD	Large enrollment, corrections research, Texas CJ partnerships
Penn State World Campus	Online (R1 affiliated)	Online	BA, MS	Penn State faculty, flexible delivery, established reputation
Arizona State University Online	Online (R1 affiliated)	Online	BS, MS	Large scale, innovative technology, ASU research faculty
North Carolina Central University	HBCU	Durham, NC	BA, MS	Race and crime focus, HBCU mentoring culture
Florida A&M University	HBCU	Tallahassee, FL	BA	Strong HBCU tradition, proximity to FSU for graduate pathways
Northern Virginia Community College	Community College	Northern VA	AA	Large system, strong transfer articulation to Virginia universities
Miami Dade College	Community College	Miami, FL	AS	Diverse student body, Florida university system articulation

Conclusion

The landscape of criminology schools and colleges in the United States reflects the discipline’s remarkable accessibility — its presence at more than eight hundred institutions serving student populations that span the full range of American demographic and socioeconomic diversity. From elite doctoral programs at research universities such as Florida State, Cincinnati, Maryland, and Albany through teaching-focused programs at regional universities and John Jay College, community college programs that provide first-generation students with accessible entry points, online programs that serve working professionals and military personnel, and HBCU programs that educate a disproportionate share of minority criminal justice professionals, the institutional ecosystem offers pathways for students with widely varying goals, resources, and circumstances. This accessibility is a genuine achievement. But accessibility without quality assurance creates a landscape in which the variation between the strongest and weakest programs is far larger than in any accredited profession, and in which students, employers, and the public lack reliable mechanisms for distinguishing between rigorous education and credential mills. The challenge for the discipline is to maintain and expand the accessibility that its diverse institutional landscape provides while developing quality assurance mechanisms that ensure all programs deliver educational experiences worthy of the credential they confer — a challenge essential not only for the students who invest their time and resources in criminology education but for the communities whose safety and justice depend on the competence of the professionals that education produces.

References

Bernard, T. J., & Engel, R. S. (2001). Conceptualizing criminal justice theory. Justice Quarterly, 18(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820100094801
Clear, T. R. (2001). Has academic criminal justice come of age? Justice Quarterly, 18(4), 709–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820100095071
Cohn, E. G., & Farrington, D. P. (2014). Publication productivity of criminologists. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 25(3), 275–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2014.921730
Frost, N. A., & Clear, T. R. (2012). New directions in correctional research. Justice Quarterly, 29(5), 619–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.667141
Gabbidon, S. L., Penn, E. B., & Richards, W. A. (2003). The status of Black criminologists in the discipline’s top-ranked journals and doctoral programs. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 14(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250300085761
Kim, B., Cwick, J. M., & Gertz, M. G. (2016). An assessment of professional engagement in the top-ranked doctoral programs. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 27(4), 538–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2016.1188890
Kleck, G., Wang, S.-Y. K., & Tark, J. (2007). Article productivity among the faculty of criminology and criminal justice doctoral programs. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 18(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250701705486
Latessa, E. J., & Lovins, B. (2010). The role of offender risk assessment: A policy maker guide. Victims & Offenders, 5(3), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2010.485900
Laub, J. H. (2004). The life course of criminology in the United States. Criminology, 42(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00511.x
Morn, F. (1995). Academic politics and the history of criminal justice education. Greenwood Press.
Mustaine, E. E., & Tewksbury, R. (2009). Trends in academic career productivity of graduates from top-ranked doctoral programs. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 20(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250903183129
Peterson, R. D. (2012). The central place of race in crime and justice. Criminology, 50(2), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00271.x
Robinson, M. B., & Rudes, D. S. (2012). The top 20 reasons students dislike studying CJ and criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 23(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2011.606367
Rockell, B. A. (2009). Challenging what they all know: Integrating the real/reel world into criminal justice pedagogy. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 20(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250802680823
Ross, J. I., & Elechi, O. O. (2002). Student attitudes towards internships in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 13(1), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250200085281
Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. University of Chicago Press.
Savelsberg, J. J., & Sampson, R. J. (2002). Mutual engagement: Criminology and the sociology of deviance. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 501–525. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140932
Sherman, L. W. (1998). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. National Institute of Justice.
Southerland, M. D. (2002). Criminal justice curricula in the United States: A decade of change. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820200095381
Steiner, B., Wright, E. M., & Toto, S. (2020). What matters in doctoral education in criminology and criminal justice? Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 31(2), 153–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2019.1705987
Stichman, A. J., & Farkas, M. A. (2005). The pedagogical use of internships in criminal justice programs. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 16(1), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250500082278
Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. E. (2011). How many are too many? Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2010.516561
Unnever, J. D., & Owusu-Bempah, A. (2019). A Black criminology matters. In J. D. Unnever, S. L. Gabbidon, & C. Chouhy (Eds.), Building a Black criminology (pp. 3–30). Routledge.
Weisburd, D., & Neyroud, P. (2011). Police science: Toward a new paradigm. New Perspectives in Policing, January, 1–23. Harvard Kennedy School and National Institute of Justice.

Related Articles