Study Criminal Justice Online - Criminology

Study criminal justice online has become a primary educational pathway for hundreds of thousands of students who pursue criminological knowledge through digital platforms while managing the professional responsibilities, family obligations, and geographic constraints that make traditional residential attendance impractical or impossible. As a student-experience dimension of Criminal Justice Education, studying criminal justice online requires not only intellectual engagement with the discipline’s theories, methods, and institutional knowledge but also a set of practical competencies — self-directed learning, digital literacy, time management, and remote professional networking — that residential education does not demand to the same degree. Within the broader field of Criminology, the experience of studying online shapes how students understand and engage with criminological knowledge, how they develop professional identities, and whether they emerge with the analytical competencies that effective criminal justice practice, policy analysis, and scholarly research require.

Introduction

Studying criminal justice online is not simply a matter of reading the same textbooks and watching the same lectures through a screen instead of in a lecture hall. The online learning environment creates a fundamentally different educational experience — one that offers unprecedented flexibility and access but that also demands self-regulation, initiative, and engagement strategies that residential students may never need to develop. Research on online learning across disciplines has consistently found that the students who succeed in online formats are those who bring or develop strong self-directed learning skills: the ability to set and maintain study schedules without external enforcement, to engage actively with content rather than passively consuming it, to seek help proactively when they struggle, and to sustain motivation through courses that lack the social energy and accountability of physical classroom attendance (Means, Toyama, Murphy, Bakia, & Jones, 2010).

The criminal justice student population amplifies both the opportunities and challenges of online study. A substantial proportion of online criminal justice students are working professionals — police officers on rotating shifts, correctional officers in facilities hours from the nearest campus, probation agents with unpredictable caseload demands, court personnel with rigid scheduling requirements — whose work experience provides a rich foundation for connecting academic concepts to professional reality but whose professional obligations create time pressures and energy demands that compete directly with academic engagement (Hilal & Densley, 2013). Military service members and veterans pursuing criminal justice education through GI Bill benefits face deployment schedules, time zone challenges, and transition stresses that add complexity to the online study experience. First-generation college students studying criminal justice at community colleges or regional universities online may lack the informal knowledge about academic expectations, study strategies, and institutional navigation that students from college-educated families absorb without formal instruction (Gabbidon, Penn, & Richards, 2003).

This article provides a practical guide to studying criminal justice online successfully — covering how to get started, how to develop effective study habits, how to engage meaningfully with online course content, how to balance academic demands with work and family responsibilities, how to use digital resources for criminal justice research, how to build professional networks in an online environment, and how to translate online study into career advancement.

Getting Started: Preparation and Orientation

Choosing the Right Program and Courses

The foundation of successful online criminal justice study is choosing a program and courses that match the student’s educational goals, career aspirations, financial resources, and learning preferences. This selection process — discussed in greater detail in the articles on online criminology schools, criminal justice classes online, and criminal justice major schools within this category — requires evaluating institutional accreditation (regional accreditation from a recognized body is essential), faculty qualifications (doctoral-qualified, research-active faculty produce stronger instruction), curricular depth (programs requiring theory, methods, and statistics develop analytical skills that descriptive-only programs do not), and student support services (advising, tutoring, library access, career counseling) that affect the quality of the online experience (Steiner, Wright, & Toto, 2020; Frost & Clear, 2012).

Students who are new to online learning should consider starting with a single course rather than a full course load to develop their online study skills, test their time management strategies, and adjust to the asynchronous or synchronous format before committing to the demands of multiple simultaneous courses. Many institutions allow non-degree enrollment that permits prospective students to take individual courses without full program admission, providing a low-risk opportunity to evaluate the program’s quality, the platform’s usability, and the student’s own readiness for online study before making a larger commitment (Morn, 1995). Penn State World Campus, Arizona State University Online, University of Central Florida, and many other institutions offer non-degree enrollment options that serve this exploratory function.

The technology setup for online study deserves attention before courses begin. Students need a reliable computer (desktop or laptop rather than tablet or smartphone for writing-intensive work), a stable internet connection with sufficient bandwidth for video streaming and video conferencing, a webcam and microphone for synchronous sessions and proctored examinations, and access to word processing software and any specialized applications — R or SPSS for statistics courses, QGIS or ArcGIS for GIS courses — that specific courses require (Saulnier, 2015). Creating a dedicated study space — a quiet area with minimal distractions, adequate lighting, and the physical organization to support sustained intellectual work — significantly improves concentration and productivity compared to studying in shared living spaces, at kitchen tables, or on couches where domestic activity competes for attention.

Navigating the Learning Management System

Learning management systems — Canvas, Blackboard, Brightspace (D2L), Moodle — serve as the digital infrastructure through which online courses are delivered, and facility with the LMS is a prerequisite for effective online study. Most institutions provide orientation modules or tutorials that familiarize students with the platform’s features — accessing course materials, submitting assignments, participating in discussion forums, checking grades, communicating with instructors, and using collaborative tools. Students who skip orientation and attempt to figure out the LMS while simultaneously engaging with course content create unnecessary stress and may miss assignments, deadlines, or participation requirements that the LMS tracks automatically (Cordner & Shain, 2011).

The notification and calendar features of learning management systems provide essential organizational support for online students managing multiple courses and competing obligations. Configuring the LMS to send email or mobile notifications for new announcements, approaching deadlines, discussion forum activity, and grade postings ensures that students stay connected to their courses even during busy periods when they might not log in voluntarily. Downloading syllabi and entering all assignment due dates into a personal calendar at the beginning of each semester creates a semester-long planning framework that prevents the last-minute scrambles and missed deadlines that are the most common causes of poor performance in online courses (Robinson & Rudes, 2012).

The mobile capabilities of modern LMS platforms allow students to maintain course engagement during time fragments that might otherwise be unproductive — reading discussion forum posts during lunch breaks, reviewing lecture slides while commuting on public transit, or checking announcements during lulls in workplace activity. While substantial academic work (writing papers, analyzing data, engaging deeply with readings) requires the focused attention that a dedicated study session provides, the ability to maintain peripheral engagement with course activity through mobile access helps online students feel connected to their courses and aware of upcoming demands even during their busiest days (Bachman & Schutt, 2020).

Effective Study Strategies for Online Criminal Justice

Active Reading and Content Engagement

The reading demands of online criminal justice courses are substantial — and the reading strategies that produce genuine learning differ from the passive scanning that many students default to. Criminological texts — theoretical analyses, empirical research reports, policy evaluations, legal analyses — require active reading strategies that go beyond highlighting and underlining to include annotation (writing marginal notes that respond to, question, or connect the text to other sources), summarization (writing brief summaries of each section’s main argument in one’s own words), and interrogation (asking questions of the text: What is the author’s central claim? What evidence supports it? What are the limitations? How does this connect to other readings in the course?) (Cullen, Agnew, & Wilcox, 2014).

Online courses that assign primary sources — original research articles from journals such as Criminology, Justice Quarterly, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, and Journal of Criminal Justice — rather than relying exclusively on textbook summaries require students to develop the capacity to read empirical research critically (Cohn & Farrington, 2014). This means understanding the structure of a research article (abstract, introduction, literature review, methods, results, discussion), evaluating the appropriateness of the research design for the question asked, assessing whether the findings support the conclusions drawn, and identifying the limitations that the authors acknowledge and those they do not. Students who develop this critical reading capacity during their online coursework acquire one of the most professionally valuable and transferable competencies that criminal justice education can produce — the ability to evaluate evidence-based claims rather than accepting them at face value (Sherman, 1998).

Video lectures, which supplement or replace textbook readings in many online courses, require their own engagement strategies. Passive viewing — watching lectures while checking email, browsing social media, or performing household tasks — produces minimal learning regardless of the lecture’s quality. Active viewing — taking notes on key concepts and arguments, pausing to reflect on connections to readings and prior knowledge, rewinding to re-examine complex points, and summarizing each lecture’s main ideas after viewing — produces learning outcomes comparable to attentive live lecture attendance (Freeman et al., 2014). The advantage of recorded lectures over live lectures is precisely this capacity for pausing, rewinding, and reviewing — an advantage that students who treat video lectures as background entertainment completely forfeit.

Discussion Forum Engagement

Discussion forums represent the primary interactive component of asynchronous online criminal justice courses, and the quality of a student’s forum engagement significantly affects both their learning and their course grade. Well-designed forums require students to stake analytical positions on criminological questions, support those positions with evidence from readings and research, respond substantively to classmates’ arguments, and engage in scholarly dialogue that develops analytical reasoning through intellectual exchange (Rockell, 2009). Students who treat forum posts as perfunctory requirements — posting the minimum word count, summarizing readings without analysis, agreeing with classmates without adding substance — miss the intellectual development opportunity that forums provide and typically receive lower participation grades than students who engage substantively.

Effective forum engagement strategies include reading all assigned materials before writing initial posts, formulating a specific analytical argument rather than merely summarizing content, citing specific evidence (author, year, findings) to support claims, responding to classmates by engaging with their arguments rather than simply agreeing or sharing tangentially related opinions, and raising questions that push the discussion toward deeper analysis rather than broader coverage. The analytical writing skills that substantive forum participation develops — the ability to construct evidence-based arguments in clear, concise prose — transfer directly to professional contexts where criminal justice professionals write reports, policy analyses, case summaries, and formal correspondence (Bachman & Schutt, 2020).

The social dimensions of forum participation deserve attention as well. In residential courses, students develop relationships through physical proximity, before-and-after-class conversations, and the nonverbal communication that human beings use to build rapport. Online forums replace these organic social interactions with text-based exchanges that can feel impersonal but that can also develop into meaningful intellectual relationships when students invest in collegial engagement. Students who learn classmates’ names, reference their prior contributions, and maintain a tone of scholarly respect and intellectual curiosity create the kind of collaborative learning community that the best residential seminars also produce — proof that intellectual community is a function of engagement quality rather than physical proximity (Kim, Cwick, & Gertz, 2016).

Balancing Academic Study with Work and Life

Time Management for Working Professionals

The single most important determinant of success for criminal justice students studying online while working full-time is the quality of their time management — their ability to create, protect, and consistently use dedicated study time despite the competing demands of work, family, and daily life. Research on adult learners in online programs has consistently identified time management as the skill most strongly associated with course completion and academic performance, more important than prior academic preparation, technological proficiency, or even intellectual ability (Tewksbury & Mustaine, 2011). The students who succeed are not necessarily the smartest or the most experienced; they are the ones who treat study time as a non-negotiable commitment rather than a flexible option.

Effective time management strategies for working criminal justice professionals studying online include establishing regular study blocks at consistent times each week — ideally the same days and times each week, creating a routine that becomes habitual rather than requiring daily decision-making about when to study. The optimal study schedule varies with individual work patterns: day-shift officers may study in the evenings; night-shift officers may study in the mornings after sleep; officers on rotating shifts may need to adjust their study schedule with each rotation, planning ahead to ensure that shift changes do not create gaps in academic engagement. Students should calculate the total weekly time investment each course requires — typically 9 to 12 hours per week for a three-credit course, including reading, viewing lectures, discussion posting, and assignment preparation — and verify that their weekly schedule can accommodate this investment before enrolling (Paoline & Terrill, 2007).

The segmentation of study time into focused sessions with defined objectives produces better results than extended but unfocused study periods. A ninety-minute session dedicated to completing a specific reading assignment and drafting a discussion forum post accomplishes more than three hours of multitasking in which reading, email, social media, and domestic interruptions compete for attention. The Pomodoro technique — working in focused twenty-five-minute intervals separated by five-minute breaks, with a longer break after four intervals — provides a structured approach to maintaining concentration during study sessions that has been associated with improved productivity across learning contexts (Robinson & Rudes, 2012). Students who protect their study sessions from interruptions — turning off phone notifications, closing non-essential browser tabs, communicating to family members that study time is not to be interrupted except for genuine emergencies — create the conditions for the deep cognitive engagement that genuine learning requires.

Family Support and Personal Well-Being

The support of family members — spouses, partners, parents, children — significantly affects the success of online criminal justice students whose academic commitments compete with domestic responsibilities for time, energy, and attention. Students who communicate clearly with family members about their educational goals, their study schedules, and the specific kinds of support they need (protecting study time from interruptions, sharing household responsibilities, providing encouragement during stressful periods) are more likely to maintain the consistent engagement that online coursework demands than those who attempt to add academic work to their existing responsibilities without renegotiating the domestic division of labor (Hilal & Densley, 2013).

The psychological demands of online study — isolation from peers, the self-discipline required for sustained independent work, the frustration of managing technology, the stress of balancing multiple roles — can produce anxiety, burnout, and diminished motivation that affect both academic performance and personal well-being. Students who recognize these psychological demands and develop coping strategies — maintaining social connections outside of academic work, exercising regularly, establishing boundaries between study time and personal time, seeking help from academic support services when they struggle — sustain their engagement more effectively than those who push through stress without addressing its sources. Programs that provide student wellness resources, peer support networks, and accessible counseling services demonstrate institutional commitment to student success that extends beyond academic content delivery (Steiner, Wright, & Toto, 2020).

Using Online Resources for Criminal Justice Research

Digital Libraries and Data Sources

One of the genuine advantages of studying criminal justice online is the extraordinary volume of research literature, data, and analytical tools that are accessible through the internet regardless of the student’s physical location. Students at residential programs may have superior access to physical library collections and in-person research support, but online students with institutional library credentials and internet access can reach the same digital databases, data archives, and analytical tools that researchers at the most elite institutions use daily (Piquero & Weisburd, 2010).

Essential digital resources for online criminal justice students include Criminal Justice Abstracts and Sociological Abstracts for literature searching, the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) for free access to criminal justice research reports, JSTOR and Google Scholar for broad academic literature access, the Bureau of Justice Statistics for crime and justice data, the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports and NIBRS data for police-reported crime statistics, the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) for archived datasets, and the National Institute of Justice‘s CrimeSolutions website for evidence ratings on criminal justice programs and practices. Students who develop proficiency with these resources early in their studies build research capabilities that serve them throughout their academic careers and beyond — in graduate study, policy analysis, program evaluation, and any professional role that requires engagement with criminal justice evidence (Santos, 2017).

The open-access movement has expanded the research literature available to online students beyond what institutional library subscriptions provide. PubMed Central provides free access to public health and biomedical research relevant to violence, substance abuse, and mental health in criminal justice populations. SSRN (Social Science Research Network) hosts working papers and preprints from criminal justice scholars. Many individual researchers maintain personal websites or Google Scholar profiles where they share pre-publication versions of their work. Government agencies — NIJ, BJS, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Government Accountability Office — publish research reports freely accessible to all users. Students who learn to combine institutional database access with open-access resources can assemble research portfolios that rival those of students at the best-resourced residential programs (Cohn & Farrington, 2014).

Writing and Research Skills Development

The writing demands of online criminal justice study provide continuous opportunities for skills development that students should approach as an investment in professional competence rather than a burden to be minimized. Every discussion forum post, research paper, case analysis, policy brief, and examination essay is a chance to practice the analytical writing that criminal justice careers demand — the ability to articulate a clear thesis, marshal evidence from credible sources, organize an argument logically, and communicate findings in prose that is precise, accessible, and free of jargon (Southerland, 2002).

University writing centers — many of which now offer services online through video consultations, email feedback, and asynchronous document review — provide individualized support that can dramatically improve writing quality when students use them consistently rather than only in crisis. The Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL) provides free, publicly accessible guidance on academic writing, APA citation style, research paper structure, and grammar that any student can use regardless of institutional affiliation. Students who view their writing skills as developmental — capable of improvement through practice, feedback, and deliberate attention — approach writing assignments with a growth mindset that produces genuine skill advancement over the course of a degree program. Students who view writing as a fixed talent — something they either have or lack — approach assignments defensively and miss the developmental opportunity that sustained academic writing provides (Bachman & Schutt, 2020).

Research skills — the ability to formulate researchable questions, search databases systematically, evaluate source credibility, synthesize findings across multiple sources, and construct evidence-based arguments — develop through deliberate practice across multiple courses rather than through a single research methods class. Students who apply research skills in every course — searching databases for their discussion posts rather than relying on textbook summaries, citing empirical findings in their written assignments, evaluating the methodology of studies referenced in their readings — develop research competence incrementally in ways that produce more durable learning than intensive methods instruction followed by courses that never require its application (Cullen, Agnew, & Wilcox, 2014).

Building Professional Networks and Career Connections Online

Virtual Networking and Professional Development

One of the most significant challenges of studying criminal justice online is the absence of the organic networking opportunities that residential programs provide — the hallway conversations, study groups, faculty office visits, department events, and campus career fairs through which residential students build the professional relationships that support career development. Online students must create these networking opportunities deliberately rather than encountering them as byproducts of physical presence — a difference that requires effort but that can produce professional connections as valuable as those that residential students develop (Mustaine & Tewksbury, 2009).

Professional association membership provides the most structured pathway for online students to build disciplinary networks. Student memberships in the American Society of Criminology (ASC) and the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences (ACJS) provide access to annual conferences — the primary networking venues in the discipline — where students can attend research presentations, participate in workshops, meet faculty from programs across the country, and connect with peers who share their research interests and career goals. Regional associations — the Western Society of Criminology, the Southern Criminal Justice Association, the Midwestern Criminal Justice Association — hold smaller, less expensive conferences that may be more accessible to online students with limited travel budgets (Laub, 2004). The American Society of Evidence-Based Policing (ASEBP) provides networking opportunities specifically oriented toward the research-practice nexus that many online criminal justice students occupy as working professionals.

LinkedIn, academic Twitter/X, ResearchGate, and other professional social media platforms provide additional networking channels that online students can use to connect with faculty, researchers, practitioners, and fellow students beyond their own programs. Following criminology scholars whose work interests them, engaging with research discussions, sharing relevant content, and participating in online communities organized around specific criminal justice topics (evidence-based policing, restorative justice, correctional rehabilitation, cybercrime) builds professional visibility and intellectual community that supplements formal course interactions. Students who use professional social media strategically — presenting a professional identity, engaging substantively with scholarly content, and building a visible track record of intellectual engagement — create networking capital that can support career transitions and professional opportunities (Sherman, 2013).

From Online Study to Career Advancement

The ultimate purpose of studying criminal justice online — for most students — is career advancement: entering the criminal justice field, advancing within it, or transitioning from one sector to another. The translation of online study into career outcomes depends on how effectively students integrate their academic learning with professional development strategies that position them competitively in target employment markets (Clear, 2001).

For working professionals, online study supports career advancement through multiple channels. The credential itself — bachelor’s degree, master’s degree, or specialized certification — satisfies educational requirements for promotion, salary enhancement, or eligibility for specialized assignments in many criminal justice agencies (Hilal & Densley, 2013). The competencies developed through coursework — evidence evaluation, analytical writing, statistical reasoning, theoretical analysis, policy evaluation — enhance professional performance in ways that colleagues, supervisors, and promotion boards may recognize. The knowledge acquired through specialized courses — cybercrime investigation, crime analysis, evidence-based corrections, forensic methods — opens pathways to specialized units and assignments that generalist experience alone does not access. And the professional networks built through conference attendance, association membership, and online engagement create connections that surface job opportunities, provide references, and offer mentoring that supports career navigation (Andrews & Bonta, 2010).

For students entering the criminal justice field from outside — career changers, recent graduates, military veterans transitioning to civilian careers — online study provides the foundational knowledge and credential that entry-level positions require. Federal law enforcement agencies — the FBI, DEA, ATF, Secret Service, Homeland Security Investigations — require bachelor’s degrees for agent positions and value candidates with graduate education, language skills, and analytical competencies developed through rigorous coursework (Carter, 2009). Policy research organizations — the RAND Corporation, the Urban Institute, the Vera Institute of Justice — hire analysts with master’s-level training in research methods and criminal justice policy. These employers evaluate candidates’ credentials, analytical skills, and professional experience — not the delivery format through which they acquired their education.

Table 1. Study Strategies for Online Criminal Justice Students

Study Dimension	Effective Strategies	Common Mistakes	Resources
Time Management	Fixed weekly study blocks; course-specific time budgets; calendar with all deadlines	Treating study as flexible; underestimating time requirements; last-minute work	LMS calendar tools, personal planners, Pomodoro apps
Reading	Active annotation; section summaries; interrogation questions; critical reading of research articles	Passive highlighting; skimming without comprehension; skipping primary sources	Course textbooks, journal databases, NCJRS library
Discussion Forums	Evidence-based arguments; specific citations; substantive peer responses; analytical positions	Minimum-word-count posts; summary without analysis; agreeing without adding substance	Course readings, Google Scholar, BJS data
Writing	Thesis-driven arguments; evidence from credible sources; logical organization; revision before submission	First-draft submissions; opinion without evidence; jargon; passive voice overuse	Purdue OWL, university writing center, APA style guide
Video Lectures	Note-taking; pause-and-reflect; post-lecture summaries; rewinding complex points	Background viewing; multitasking; passive consumption without notes	LMS video tools, note-taking apps
Research Skills	Systematic database searching; source evaluation; citation tracking; data analysis	Google-only searching; Wikipedia dependence; uncritical source acceptance	Criminal Justice Abstracts, JSTOR, Google Scholar, ICPSR
Networking	Professional association membership; conference attendance; LinkedIn engagement; faculty outreach	Isolation; no professional development outside coursework; no career planning	ASC, ACJS, LinkedIn, regional associations
Work-Life Balance	Clear boundaries; family communication; stress management; realistic course loads	Overcommitting; ignoring stress; sacrificing sleep; neglecting relationships	Program advising, wellness resources, peer support

Conclusion

Studying criminal justice online successfully requires more than intellectual engagement with criminological content — it demands the practical competencies of self-directed learning, strategic time management, proactive networking, and deliberate career planning that residential education may develop incidentally but that online study requires intentionally. The students who thrive in online criminal justice programs are those who approach their education as a serious professional investment, who develop and maintain consistent study routines, who engage substantively with course content through active reading and analytical writing, who build professional networks through association membership and digital engagement, and who connect their academic learning to concrete career development strategies. The flexibility and accessibility that online study provides are genuine advantages — they open criminal justice education to populations that residential programs cannot effectively serve and they allow professionals to advance their careers without abandoning them. But flexibility without discipline produces procrastination rather than learning, and accessibility without engagement produces credentials without competence. The practical strategies outlined in this article are designed to help online criminal justice students transform the opportunity that digital education represents into the genuine analytical competence, professional advancement, and intellectual growth that studying criminal justice — in any format — should produce.

References

Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Anderson Publishing.
Bachman, R. D., & Schutt, R. K. (2020). The practice of research in criminology and criminal justice (7th ed.). Sage Publications.
Carter, D. L. (2009). Law enforcement intelligence: A guide for state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies (2nd ed.). U.S. Department of Justice.
Clear, T. R. (2001). Has academic criminal justice come of age? Justice Quarterly, 18(4), 709–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820100095071
Cohn, E. G., & Farrington, D. P. (2014). Publication productivity of criminologists. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 25(3), 275–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2014.921730
Cordner, G., & Shain, C. (2011). The changing landscape of police education and training. Police Practice and Research, 12(4), 281–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2011.587679
Cullen, F. T., Agnew, R., & Wilcox, P. (2014). Criminological theory: Past to present (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Frost, N. A., & Clear, T. R. (2012). New directions in correctional research. Justice Quarterly, 29(5), 619–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.667141
Gabbidon, S. L., Penn, E. B., & Richards, W. A. (2003). The status of Black criminologists in the discipline’s top-ranked journals and doctoral programs. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 14(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250300085761
Hilal, S. M., & Densley, J. A. (2013). Higher education and local police. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 82(5), 1–3.
Kim, B., Cwick, J. M., & Gertz, M. G. (2016). An assessment of professional engagement in the top-ranked doctoral programs. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 27(4), 538–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2016.1188890
Laub, J. H. (2004). The life course of criminology in the United States. Criminology, 42(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00511.x
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning. U.S. Department of Education.
Morn, F. (1995). Academic politics and the history of criminal justice education. Greenwood Press.
Mustaine, E. E., & Tewksbury, R. (2009). Trends in academic career productivity. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 20(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250903183129
Paoline, E. A., III, & Terrill, W. (2007). Police education, experience, and the use of force. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854806290239
Piquero, A. R., & Weisburd, D. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of quantitative criminology. Springer.
Robinson, M. B., & Rudes, D. S. (2012). The top 20 reasons students dislike studying CJ and criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 23(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2011.606367
Rockell, B. A. (2009). Challenging what they all know. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 20(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250802680823
Santos, R. B. (2017). Crime analysis with crime mapping (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Saulnier, A. (2015). Online and face-to-face course delivery. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 26(2), 166–185.
Sherman, L. W. (1998). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. National Institute of Justice.
Sherman, L. W. (2013). The rise of evidence-based policing. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 377–451. https://doi.org/10.1086/670819
Southerland, M. D. (2002). Criminal justice curricula in the United States. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820200095381
Steiner, B., Wright, E. M., & Toto, S. (2020). What matters in doctoral education in criminology and criminal justice? Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 31(2), 153–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2019.1705987
Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. E. (2011). How many are too many? Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2010.516561
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

Related Articles